Zelman v. Simmons-Harris
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Zelman_v._Simmons-Harris an entity of type: Thing
Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, 536 U.S. 639 (2002), was a 5–4 decision of the United States Supreme Court that upheld an Ohio program that used school vouchers. The Court decided that the program did not violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, even if the vouchers could be used for private religious schools.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Zelman v. Simmons-Harris
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Susan Tave Zelman,Superintendent of Public Instruction of Ohio, et al., Petitioners v. Doris Simmons-Harris, et al.
xsd:integer
1680639
xsd:integer
1114481203
rdf:langString
Souter
rdf:langString
Stevens
rdf:langString
Breyer
xsd:integer
0
rdf:langString
Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer
rdf:langString
Stevens, Souter
rdf:langString
O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas
<second>
172800.0
<second>
25920.0
xsd:integer
639
xsd:integer
536
xsd:gMonthDay
--02-20
xsd:integer
2002
rdf:langString
Zelman v. Simmons-Harris,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-27
xsd:integer
2002
rdf:langString
Susan Tave Zelman, Superintendent of Public Instruction of Ohio, et al., Petitioners v. Doris Simmons-Harris, et al.
rdf:langString
The Ohio school voucher program does not violate the Establishment Clause even if the vouchers could be used for private, religious schools, because it passed a five-part test developed by the court in the case.
rdf:langString
Zelman v. Simmons-Harris
rdf:langString
Rehnquist
rdf:langString
Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, 536 U.S. 639 (2002), was a 5–4 decision of the United States Supreme Court that upheld an Ohio program that used school vouchers. The Court decided that the program did not violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, even if the vouchers could be used for private religious schools.
rdf:langString
Thomas
rdf:langString
O'Connor
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
21997