Yick Wo v. Hopkins
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Yick_Wo_v._Hopkins an entity of type: Thing
Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886), was the first case where the United States Supreme Court ruled that a law that is race-neutral on its face, but is administered in a prejudicial manner, is an infringement of the Equal Protection Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Yick Wo v. Hopkins
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Yick Wo v. Hopkins, Sheriff
xsd:integer
1346366
xsd:integer
1123188358
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-14
xsd:integer
1886
rdf:langString
unanimous
xsd:integer
6
rdf:langString
In re Yick Wo, writ of habeas corpus denied, 9 P. 139 ; In re Wo Lee, writ of habeas corpus denied, 26 F. 471
xsd:integer
356
xsd:integer
118
rdf:langString
益和
rdf:langString
Yick Wo v. Hopkins,
xsd:gMonthDay
--05-10
xsd:integer
1886
rdf:langString
Yick Wo v. Hopkins, Sheriff
rdf:langString
Racially discriminatory application of a racially neutral statute violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Supreme Court of California and Circuit Court for the District of California reversed.
rdf:langString
jik1 wo4
rdf:langString
Yick Wo v. Hopkins
rdf:langString
Wo Lee v. Hopkins
rdf:langString
Matthews
rdf:langString
Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886), was the first case where the United States Supreme Court ruled that a law that is race-neutral on its face, but is administered in a prejudicial manner, is an infringement of the Equal Protection Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
11320