Wyoming v. Houghton
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Wyoming_v._Houghton an entity of type: Thing
Wyoming v. Houghton, 526 U.S. 295 (1999), is a United States Supreme Court case which held that absent exigency, the warrantless search of a passenger's container capable of holding the object of a search for which there is probable cause is not a violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, because it is justified under the automobile exception as an effect of the car.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Wyoming v. Houghton
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Wyoming, Petitioner v. Sandra K. Houghton
xsd:integer
19346451
xsd:integer
1121872181
rdf:langString
Stevens
rdf:langString
Souter, Ginsburg
rdf:langString
Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer
<second>
172800.0
<second>
17280.0
xsd:integer
295
xsd:integer
526
xsd:gMonthDay
--01-12
xsd:integer
1999
rdf:langString
Wyoming v. Houghton,
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-05
xsd:integer
1999
rdf:langString
Wyoming, Petitioner v. Sandra K. Houghton
rdf:langString
Absent exigency, the warrantless search of a passenger's container capable of holding the object of a search for which there is probable cause is not a violation of the Fourth Amendment, justified under the automobile exception as an effect of the car.
rdf:langString
Wyoming v. Houghton
rdf:langString
Scalia
rdf:langString
Wyoming v. Houghton, 526 U.S. 295 (1999), is a United States Supreme Court case which held that absent exigency, the warrantless search of a passenger's container capable of holding the object of a search for which there is probable cause is not a violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, because it is justified under the automobile exception as an effect of the car.
rdf:langString
Breyer
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
9115