Wiggins v. Smith
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Wiggins_v._Smith an entity of type: Thing
Wiggins v. Smith, 539 U.S. 510 (2003), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court spelled out standards for "effectiveness" in the constitutional right to legal counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment. Previously the court had determined that the Sixth Amendment included the right to "effective assistance" of legal counsel, but it did not specify what constitutes "effective", thus leaving the standards for effectiveness vague. In Wiggins v. Smith, the court set forth the American Bar Association Guidelines for the Appointment and Performance of Defense Counsel in Death Penalty Cases Guideline 11.8.6.(1989), as a specific guideline by which to measure effectiveness and competence of legal counsel.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Wiggins v. Smith
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Kevin Wiggins, Petitioner v. Sewall Smith, Warden, et al.
xsd:integer
13684890
xsd:integer
1118657524
rdf:langString
Scalia
rdf:langString
Thomas
rdf:langString
Rehnquist, Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
<second>
172800.0
<second>
25920.0
xsd:integer
510
xsd:integer
539
xsd:gMonthDay
--03-24
xsd:integer
2003
rdf:langString
Wiggins v. Smith,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-26
xsd:integer
2003
rdf:langString
Kevin Wiggins, Petitioner v. Sewall Smith, Warden, et al.
rdf:langString
The performance of Wiggins' attorneys at sentencing violated his Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel.
rdf:langString
Wiggins v. Smith
rdf:langString
O'Connor
rdf:langString
Wiggins v. Smith, 539 U.S. 510 (2003), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court spelled out standards for "effectiveness" in the constitutional right to legal counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment. Previously the court had determined that the Sixth Amendment included the right to "effective assistance" of legal counsel, but it did not specify what constitutes "effective", thus leaving the standards for effectiveness vague. In Wiggins v. Smith, the court set forth the American Bar Association Guidelines for the Appointment and Performance of Defense Counsel in Death Penalty Cases Guideline 11.8.6.(1989), as a specific guideline by which to measure effectiveness and competence of legal counsel. In Strickland v. Washington, the Supreme Court set forth the factors the defendant must establish to demonstrate that counsel was ineffective. First, it must be shown that counsel's performance fell below an objective standard of reasonable competence, and second, if counsel had not been competent, that the trial outcome would likely have been different had the counsel been competent.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
12865