Vexatious litigation

http://dbpedia.org/resource/Vexatious_litigation an entity of type: Thing

濫訴意指透過各種司法程序並不是希望得到正義伸張或仲裁,而只是想讓對手遭到擾亂或牽累,或是威逼被告進行和解並以此牟利。 濫用司法資源的議題從羅馬帝國就開始有所謂「不中傷宣誓(Culumniae jusjurandum)」的機制避免婚姻官司陷入長期的爭訟。1896年,英國也通過「(Vexatious Actions Act)」,若證明某人常出入法院,是所謂的「訟棍」,可以禁止其提訟之權利。惡意訴訟、迂迴訴訟等方式。司法體系中有許多避免這類事情發生的設置。 在台灣,濫訴問題常常發生於檢察官對於可能嫌疑人求取過重刑罰。2017年一位檢察官投書媒體,指出台灣的司法官對於濫用刑事訴訟的人士並無良善的制度因應,導致惡性循環不斷發生,甚至曾發生三名訟棍三年內對於超過五百位有財務困難的計程車司機濫用訴訟方式行高利貸脅迫的案例。 rdf:langString
Vexatious litigation is legal action which is brought solely to harass or subdue an adversary. It may take the form of a primary frivolous lawsuit or may be the repetitive, burdensome, and unwarranted filing of meritless motions in a matter which is otherwise a meritorious cause of action. Filing vexatious litigation is considered an abuse of the judicial process and may result in sanctions against the offender. rdf:langString
rdf:langString Vexatious litigation
rdf:langString 濫訴
xsd:integer 32356
xsd:integer 1124104699
rdf:langString Vexatious litigation is legal action which is brought solely to harass or subdue an adversary. It may take the form of a primary frivolous lawsuit or may be the repetitive, burdensome, and unwarranted filing of meritless motions in a matter which is otherwise a meritorious cause of action. Filing vexatious litigation is considered an abuse of the judicial process and may result in sanctions against the offender. A single action, even a frivolous one, is usually not enough to raise a litigant to the level of being declared vexatious. Rather, a pattern of frivolous legal actions is typically required to rise to the level of vexatious. Repeated and severe instances by a single lawyer or firm can result in eventual disbarment. Some jurisdictions have a list of vexatious litigants: people who have repeatedly abused the legal system. Because lawyers could be disbarred for participating in this abuse of the legal process, vexatious litigants are often unable to retain legal counsel, and such litigants, therefore, represent themselves in court. Those on the vexatious litigant list are usually either forbidden from any further legal action or are required to obtain prior permission from a senior judge before taking any legal action. The process by which a person is added to the list varies among jurisdictions. In liberal democratic jurisdictions, declaring someone a vexatious litigant is considered to be a serious measure and rarely occurs, as judges and officials are reluctant to curtail a person's access to the courts. These legal actions occur in some countries of the former British Empire, where the common law system still remains: Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, UK, and US, which are specified below. The civil (codified/continental) law does not have such a prohibition.
rdf:langString 濫訴意指透過各種司法程序並不是希望得到正義伸張或仲裁,而只是想讓對手遭到擾亂或牽累,或是威逼被告進行和解並以此牟利。 濫用司法資源的議題從羅馬帝國就開始有所謂「不中傷宣誓(Culumniae jusjurandum)」的機制避免婚姻官司陷入長期的爭訟。1896年,英國也通過「(Vexatious Actions Act)」,若證明某人常出入法院,是所謂的「訟棍」,可以禁止其提訟之權利。惡意訴訟、迂迴訴訟等方式。司法體系中有許多避免這類事情發生的設置。 在台灣,濫訴問題常常發生於檢察官對於可能嫌疑人求取過重刑罰。2017年一位檢察官投書媒體,指出台灣的司法官對於濫用刑事訴訟的人士並無良善的制度因應,導致惡性循環不斷發生,甚至曾發生三名訟棍三年內對於超過五百位有財務困難的計程車司機濫用訴訟方式行高利貸脅迫的案例。
xsd:nonNegativeInteger 38054

data from the linked data cloud