United States v. Jones (2012)
http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_v._Jones_(2012) an entity of type: Thing
合众国诉琼斯案（英語：United States v. Jones，《美国判例汇编》第565卷第400页（2012年）），是美国最高法院的一个里程碑式案件，该案认为，在车辆上安装全球定位系统（GPS）跟踪设备并使用该设备监测车辆的移动违反美国宪法第四修正案。 2004年，被告琼斯涉嫌贩毒。警方调查人员要求并收到一份搜查令，要求在被告的汽车底部安装GPS跟踪装置，但随后在地理位置和时间长度上都超出了搜查令的范围。最高法院的法官们一致投票认为这是第四修正案下的一次“搜查”，尽管他们对这一结论背后的根本原因持五比四的分歧。多数人认为，通过在被告的车上安装GPS设备，警方侵犯了琼斯的“个人物品”——这种企图获取信息的搜查行为本身就构成了侵犯行为。
rdf:langString
United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that installing a Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking device on a vehicle and using the device to monitor the vehicle's movements constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
United States v. Jones (2012)
rdf:langString
合众国诉琼斯案
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
United States v. Antoine Jones
xsd:integer
32337981
xsd:integer
1122057961
xsd:integer
10
rdf:langString
Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Sotomayor
<second>
172800.0
<second>
25920.0
xsd:integer
400
xsd:integer
565
xsd:gMonthDay
--11-08
xsd:integer
2011
rdf:langString
United States v. Jones,
xsd:gMonthDay
--01-23
xsd:integer
2012
rdf:langString
United States v. Antoine Jones
rdf:langString
The attachment of the GPS device to a vehicle by the police, and its use to monitor the vehicle's movements, constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment and requires a warrant.
rdf:langString
United States v. Antoine Jones
rdf:langString
Scalia
rdf:langString
Supreme Court
rdf:langString
United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that installing a Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking device on a vehicle and using the device to monitor the vehicle's movements constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment. In 2004 Antoine Jones was suspected by police in the District of Columbia of drug trafficking. Investigators asked for and received a warrant to attach a GPS tracking device to the underside of Jones's car but then exceeded the warrant's scope in both geography and length of time. The Supreme Court ruled unanimously that this was a search under the Fourth Amendment, although they were split 5-4 as to the fundamental reasons behind that conclusion. The majority held that by physically installing the GPS device on Jones's car, the police had committed a trespass against his "personal effects", This trespass, in an attempt to obtain information, constituted a search per se.
rdf:langString
合众国诉琼斯案（英語：United States v. Jones，《美国判例汇编》第565卷第400页（2012年）），是美国最高法院的一个里程碑式案件，该案认为，在车辆上安装全球定位系统（GPS）跟踪设备并使用该设备监测车辆的移动违反美国宪法第四修正案。 2004年，被告琼斯涉嫌贩毒。警方调查人员要求并收到一份搜查令，要求在被告的汽车底部安装GPS跟踪装置，但随后在地理位置和时间长度上都超出了搜查令的范围。最高法院的法官们一致投票认为这是第四修正案下的一次“搜查”，尽管他们对这一结论背后的根本原因持五比四的分歧。多数人认为，通过在被告的车上安装GPS设备，警方侵犯了琼斯的“个人物品”——这种企图获取信息的搜查行为本身就构成了侵犯行为。
rdf:langString
Sotomayor
rdf:langString
Alito
rdf:langString
Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
35256
