United States v. Hubbell
http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_v._Hubbell an entity of type: Thing
United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27 (2000), was United States Supreme Court case involving Webster Hubbell, who had been indicted on various tax-related charges, and mail and wire fraud charges, based on documents that the government had subpoenaed from him. The Fifth Amendment provides that no person “shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.” The Supreme Court has, since 1976, applied the so-called “act-of-production doctrine.” Under this doctrine, a person can invoke his Fifth Amendment rights against the production of documents only where the very act of producing the documents is incriminating in itself.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
United States v. Hubbell
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
United States of America v. Webster Hubbell
xsd:integer
7589454
xsd:integer
1003852265
rdf:langString
Rehnquist
rdf:langString
O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer
rdf:langString
U.S. Const. amend. V; 18 USC section 6003
<second>
172800.0
<second>
25920.0
xsd:integer
27
xsd:integer
530
xsd:gMonthDay
--02-22
xsd:integer
2000
rdf:langString
United States v. Hubbell,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-05
xsd:integer
2000
rdf:langString
United States of America v. Webster Hubbell
rdf:langString
The Fifth Amendment privilege against compelled self-incrimination protects a witness from being compelled to disclose the existence of incriminating documents that the Government is unable to describe with reasonable particularity; and Where the witness produces such documents pursuant to a grant of immunity, 18 U. S. C. §6002 prevents the Government from using them to prepare criminal charges against the witness.
rdf:langString
United States v. Hubbell
rdf:langString
Stevens
rdf:langString
United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27 (2000), was United States Supreme Court case involving Webster Hubbell, who had been indicted on various tax-related charges, and mail and wire fraud charges, based on documents that the government had subpoenaed from him. The Fifth Amendment provides that no person “shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.” The Supreme Court has, since 1976, applied the so-called “act-of-production doctrine.” Under this doctrine, a person can invoke his Fifth Amendment rights against the production of documents only where the very act of producing the documents is incriminating in itself.
rdf:langString
Thomas
rdf:langString
Scalia
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
13341