United States v. Cruikshank
http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_v._Cruikshank an entity of type: Thing
United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876), was a major decision of the United States Supreme Court ruling that the U.S. Bill of Rights did not limit the power of private actors or state governments despite the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment. It reversed the federal criminal convictions for the civil rights violations committed in aid of anti-Reconstruction murders. Decided during the Reconstruction Era, the case represented a major defeat for federal efforts to protect the civil rights of African Americans.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
United States v. Cruikshank
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
United States v. Cruikshank, et al.
xsd:integer
442342
xsd:integer
1124835329
rdf:langString
Swayne, Miller, Field, Strong
xsd:integer
2
xsd:integer
542
xsd:integer
92
xsd:integer
1875
rdf:langString
United States v. Cruikshank,
xsd:date
2017-01-20
xsd:gMonthDay
--03-27
xsd:integer
1876
rdf:langString
United States v. Cruikshank, et al.
rdf:langString
The right of assembly under the First Amendment and the right to bear arms under the Second Amendment are only applicable to the federal government, not the states or private actors.
rdf:langString
United States v. Cruikshank
rdf:langString
Waite
rdf:langString
United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876), was a major decision of the United States Supreme Court ruling that the U.S. Bill of Rights did not limit the power of private actors or state governments despite the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment. It reversed the federal criminal convictions for the civil rights violations committed in aid of anti-Reconstruction murders. Decided during the Reconstruction Era, the case represented a major defeat for federal efforts to protect the civil rights of African Americans. The case developed from the strongly contested 1872 Louisiana gubernatorial election and the subsequent Colfax massacre, in which dozens of black people and three white people were killed. Federal charges were brought against several whites using the Enforcement Act of 1870, which prohibited two or more people from conspiring to deprive anyone of their constitutional rights. Charges included hindering the freedmen's First Amendment right to freely assemble and their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. In his majority opinion, Chief Justice Morrison Waite reversed the convictions of the defendants, judging that the plaintiffs had to rely on Louisiana state courts for protection. Waite ruled that neither the First Amendment nor the Second Amendment limited the powers of state governments or individuals. He further ruled that the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment limited the lawful actions of state governments, but not of individuals. The decision left African Americans in the South at the mercy of increasingly hostile state governments dominated by white Democratic legislatures, and allowed groups such as the Ku Klux Klan to continue to use paramilitary force to suppress black voting. Cruikshank was the first case to come before the Supreme Court that involved a possible violation of the Second Amendment. Decades after Cruikshank, the Supreme Court began incorporating the Bill of Rights to apply to state governments. The Court incorporated the First Amendment's freedom of assembly in De Jonge v. Oregon (1937), while the Second Amendment was incorporated in McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010).
xsd:gMonthDay
--03-30
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-24
rdf:langString
Clifford
rdf:langString
Davis, Bradley, Hunt
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
McDonald v. City of Chicago
rdf:langString
De Jonge v. Oregon
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
19909