United States v. Carolene Products Co.
http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_v._Carolene_Products_Co. an entity of type: Thing
United States v. Carolene Products Company, 304 U.S. 144 (1938), was a case of the United States Supreme Court that upheld the federal government's power to prohibit filled milk from being shipped in interstate commerce. In his majority opinion for the Court, Associate Justice Harlan F. Stone wrote that economic regulations were "presumptively constitutional" under a deferential standard of review known as the "rational basis test".
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
United States v. Carolene Products Co.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
United States v. Carolene Products Company
xsd:integer
1214243
xsd:integer
1121474696
rdf:langString
McReynolds
rdf:langString
Hughes, Brandeis, Roberts, Black
rdf:langString
U.S. Const. art. I; U.S. Const. amend. V;
xsd:integer
58
rdf:langString
Demurrer to indictment sustained, 7 F. Supp. 500
xsd:integer
144
xsd:integer
304
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-06
xsd:integer
1938
rdf:langString
United States v. Carolene Products Co.,
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-25
xsd:integer
1938
rdf:langString
United States v. Carolene Products Company
rdf:langString
The Filled Milk Act did not exceed the power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce, or violate due process under the Fifth Amendment.
rdf:langString
United States v. Carolene Products Co.
rdf:langString
Stone
rdf:langString
United States v. Carolene Products Company, 304 U.S. 144 (1938), was a case of the United States Supreme Court that upheld the federal government's power to prohibit filled milk from being shipped in interstate commerce. In his majority opinion for the Court, Associate Justice Harlan F. Stone wrote that economic regulations were "presumptively constitutional" under a deferential standard of review known as the "rational basis test". The case is most notable for Footnote Four, in which Stone wrote that the Court would exercise a stricter standard of review when a law appears on its face to violate a provision of the United States Constitution, restricts the political process in a way that could impede the repeal of an undesirable law, or discriminates against "discrete and insular" minorities. Footnote Four would influence later Supreme Court decisions, and the higher standard of review is now known as "strict scrutiny".
rdf:langString
Butler
rdf:langString
Reed and Cardozo
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
14328