Sweatt v. Painter
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Sweatt_v._Painter an entity of type: Thing
Sweatt contro Painter è un caso giudiziario affrontato alla Corte Suprema degli Stati Uniti d'America nel 1950. La battaglia legale si schierava contro la dottrina del "separati ma uguali", che permetteva la segregazione razziale dai tempi del caso Plessy v. Ferguson, del 1896. Il processo fu un punto di svolta e uno di riferimento per il successivo e celebre Brown v. Board of Education, del 1954.
rdf:langString
Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. 629 (1950), was a U.S. Supreme Court case that successfully challenged the "separate but equal" doctrine of racial segregation established by the 1896 case Plessy v. Ferguson. The case was influential in the landmark case of Brown v. Board of Education four years later.
rdf:langString
Sweatt vs Painter – sprawa zakończona orzeczeniem Sądu Najwyższego Stanów Zjednoczonych z dnia 5 czerwca 1950 r., w którym podważono ugruntowaną we wcześniejszym orzecznictwie (m.in. w sprawie ) zasadę segregacji rasowej "separate but equal".
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Sweatt contro Painter
rdf:langString
Sweatt v. Painter
rdf:langString
Sweatt v. Painter
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Heman Marion Sweatt v. Theophilus Shickel Painter
xsd:integer
383270
xsd:integer
1119667253
rdf:langString
unanimous
xsd:integer
70
rdf:langString
Cert. to the Supreme Court of Texas
xsd:integer
629
xsd:integer
339
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-04
xsd:integer
1950
rdf:langString
Sweatt v. Painter,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-05
xsd:integer
1950
rdf:langString
Heman Marion Sweatt v. Theophilus Shickel Painter
rdf:langString
Segregation as applied to the admissions processes for law school in the United States violates Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, because separate facilities in legal education are inherently unequal. Texas Supreme Court reversed.
rdf:langString
Sweatt v. Painter, et al.
rdf:langString
Vinson
rdf:langString
Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. 629 (1950), was a U.S. Supreme Court case that successfully challenged the "separate but equal" doctrine of racial segregation established by the 1896 case Plessy v. Ferguson. The case was influential in the landmark case of Brown v. Board of Education four years later. The case involved a black man, Heman Marion Sweatt, who was refused admission to the School of Law of the University of Texas, whose president was Theophilus Painter, on the grounds that the Texas State Constitution prohibited integrated education. The decision was delivered on the same day as another case involving similar issues, McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents.
rdf:langString
Sweatt contro Painter è un caso giudiziario affrontato alla Corte Suprema degli Stati Uniti d'America nel 1950. La battaglia legale si schierava contro la dottrina del "separati ma uguali", che permetteva la segregazione razziale dai tempi del caso Plessy v. Ferguson, del 1896. Il processo fu un punto di svolta e uno di riferimento per il successivo e celebre Brown v. Board of Education, del 1954.
rdf:langString
Sweatt vs Painter – sprawa zakończona orzeczeniem Sądu Najwyższego Stanów Zjednoczonych z dnia 5 czerwca 1950 r., w którym podważono ugruntowaną we wcześniejszym orzecznictwie (m.in. w sprawie ) zasadę segregacji rasowej "separate but equal". Sprawa dotyczyła czarnoskórego mężczyzny (H. M. Sweatta), któremu odmówiono przyjęcia do szkoły prawa Uniwersytetu Teksańskiego w Austin wyłącznie z powodu rasy powołując się na fakt, iż konstytucja stanu Teksas zabraniała wspólnej edukacji osób białych z osobami o innym kolorze skóry. Jednocześnie w tym czasie nie było w Teksasie żadnej szkoły prawa, która przyjmowałaby osoby czarnoskóre.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
6462
