Stewart v. Martinez-Villareal
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Stewart_v._Martinez-Villareal an entity of type: Thing
Stewart v. Martinez-Villareal, 523 U.S. 637 (1998), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b) did not apply to a petition that raises only a competency to be executed claim and that respondent did not, therefore, need authorization to file his petition in the District Court.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Stewart v. Martinez-Villareal
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Terry Stewart, Director, Arizona Department of Correction, et al., Petitioners v. Ramon Martinez-Villareal
xsd:integer
19672427
xsd:integer
922503225
rdf:langString
Thomas
rdf:langString
Scalia
rdf:langString
Thomas
rdf:langString
Scalia
rdf:langString
Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
<second>
172800.0
rdf:langString
Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
xsd:integer
637
xsd:integer
523
xsd:gMonthDay
--02-25
xsd:integer
1998
rdf:langString
Stewart v. Martinez-Villareal,
xsd:gMonthDay
--05-18
xsd:integer
1998
rdf:langString
Terry Stewart, Director, Arizona Department of Correction, et al., Petitioners v. Ramon Martinez-Villareal
rdf:langString
§2244 did not apply to a petition that raises only a competency to be executed claim and that respondent did not, therefore, need authorization to file his petition in the District Court.
rdf:langString
Stewart v. Martinez-Villareal
rdf:langString
Rehnquist
rdf:langString
Stewart v. Martinez-Villareal, 523 U.S. 637 (1998), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b) did not apply to a petition that raises only a competency to be executed claim and that respondent did not, therefore, need authorization to file his petition in the District Court.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
3836