South Carolina v. Katzenbach
http://dbpedia.org/resource/South_Carolina_v._Katzenbach an entity of type: Thing
South Carolina v. Katzenbach, 383 U.S. 301 (1966), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court that rejected a challenge from the state of South Carolina to the preclearance provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which required that some states submit changes in election districts to the Attorney General of the United States (at the time, Nicholas Katzenbach). The preclearance provisions were ruled constitutional and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was enforced in full.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
South Carolina v. Katzenbach
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
South Carolina v.Nicholas Katzenbach, Attorney General
xsd:integer
10050845
xsd:integer
1105529547
rdf:langString
Douglas, Clark, Harlan, Brennan, Stewart, White, Fortas
<second>
172800.0
xsd:integer
301
xsd:integer
383
xsd:integer
1966
rdf:langString
South Carolina v. Katzenbach,
xsd:gMonthDay
--03-07
xsd:integer
1966
rdf:langString
South Carolina v. Nicholas Katzenbach, Attorney General
rdf:langString
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 does not violate the states' constitutional ability to implement and control elections. Therefore, it is a constitutionally valid exercise of congressional power for the effectuation of the Fifteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America.
rdf:langString
South Carolina v. Katzenbach
rdf:langString
Warren
rdf:langString
South Carolina v. Katzenbach, 383 U.S. 301 (1966), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court that rejected a challenge from the state of South Carolina to the preclearance provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which required that some states submit changes in election districts to the Attorney General of the United States (at the time, Nicholas Katzenbach). The preclearance provisions were ruled constitutional and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was enforced in full.
xsd:gMonthDay
--01-17
xsd:integer
18
rdf:langString
Black
rdf:langString
Does the Voting Rights Act of 1965 violate the states' constitutional ability to implement and control elections?
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
11933