South Carolina v. Katzenbach

http://dbpedia.org/resource/South_Carolina_v._Katzenbach an entity of type: Thing

South Carolina v. Katzenbach, 383 U.S. 301 (1966), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court that rejected a challenge from the state of South Carolina to the preclearance provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which required that some states submit changes in election districts to the Attorney General of the United States (at the time, Nicholas Katzenbach). The preclearance provisions were ruled constitutional and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was enforced in full. rdf:langString
rdf:langString South Carolina v. Katzenbach
rdf:langString
rdf:langString South Carolina v.Nicholas Katzenbach, Attorney General
xsd:integer 10050845
xsd:integer 1105529547
rdf:langString Douglas, Clark, Harlan, Brennan, Stewart, White, Fortas
<second> 172800.0
xsd:integer 301
xsd:integer 383
xsd:integer 1966
rdf:langString South Carolina v. Katzenbach,
xsd:gMonthDay --03-07
xsd:integer 1966
rdf:langString South Carolina v. Nicholas Katzenbach, Attorney General
rdf:langString The Voting Rights Act of 1965 does not violate the states' constitutional ability to implement and control elections. Therefore, it is a constitutionally valid exercise of congressional power for the effectuation of the Fifteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America.
rdf:langString South Carolina v. Katzenbach
rdf:langString Warren
rdf:langString South Carolina v. Katzenbach, 383 U.S. 301 (1966), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court that rejected a challenge from the state of South Carolina to the preclearance provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which required that some states submit changes in election districts to the Attorney General of the United States (at the time, Nicholas Katzenbach). The preclearance provisions were ruled constitutional and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was enforced in full.
xsd:gMonthDay --01-17
xsd:integer 18
rdf:langString Black
rdf:langString Does the Voting Rights Act of 1965 violate the states' constitutional ability to implement and control elections?
xsd:nonNegativeInteger 11933

data from the linked data cloud