Sharp v. Murphy
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Sharp_v._Murphy an entity of type: Thing
Als Sharp v. Murphy wird ein Gerichtsverfahren vor dem Obersten Gerichtshof der Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika bezeichnet. Das Urteil wurde am 9. Juli 2020 gefällt. Das Gericht entschied, dass das Indianerreservat der Muskogee-Indianer bei der Gründung des Staates Oklahoma nicht legal aufgelöst worden ist, und dass das Reservat in seinen Grenzen von 1866 fortbesteht.Grundlage für das Gerichtsverfahren bildete das Major Crimes Act aus dem Jahre 1885. Das Gericht entschied, dass das Verbrechen, welche auf Reservatsgebiet begangen wurden, von einem Bundesgericht behandelt werden müssen, und nicht von einem Gericht des Staates Oklahoma. Das Urteil baut auf der Argumentation des Gerichtsurteils McGirt v. Oklahoma auf, welches am selben Tag entschieden wurde.
rdf:langString
Sharp v. Murphy, 591 U.S. ___ (2020), was a Supreme Court of the United States case of whether Congress disestablished the Muscogee (Creek) Nation reservation. After holding the case from the 2018 term, the case was decided on July 9, 2020, in a per curiam decision following McGirt v. Oklahoma that, for the purposes of the Major Crimes Act, the reservations were never disestablished and remain Native American country.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Sharp v. Murphy
rdf:langString
Sharp v. Murphy
rdf:langString
Tommy Sharp, Interim Warden Oklahoma State Penitentiary, Petitioner v. Patrick Dwayne Murphy
xsd:integer
59126146
xsd:integer
1122488727
rdf:langString
Thomas
rdf:langString
Alito
xsd:integer
17
xsd:integer
140
172800.0
<second>
25920.0
rdf:langString
___
xsd:integer
591
xsd:gMonthDay
--11-27
xsd:integer
2018
xsd:gMonthDay
--07-09
xsd:integer
2020
rdf:langString
Tommy Sharp, Interim Warden Oklahoma State Penitentiary, Petitioner v. Patrick Dwayne Murphy
rdf:langString
For Major Crimes Act purposes, land reserved for the Creek Nation since the 19th century remains "Indian country".
rdf:langString
Sharp v. Murphy
rdf:langString
Supreme Court
rdf:langString
Als Sharp v. Murphy wird ein Gerichtsverfahren vor dem Obersten Gerichtshof der Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika bezeichnet. Das Urteil wurde am 9. Juli 2020 gefällt. Das Gericht entschied, dass das Indianerreservat der Muskogee-Indianer bei der Gründung des Staates Oklahoma nicht legal aufgelöst worden ist, und dass das Reservat in seinen Grenzen von 1866 fortbesteht.Grundlage für das Gerichtsverfahren bildete das Major Crimes Act aus dem Jahre 1885. Das Gericht entschied, dass das Verbrechen, welche auf Reservatsgebiet begangen wurden, von einem Bundesgericht behandelt werden müssen, und nicht von einem Gericht des Staates Oklahoma. Das Urteil baut auf der Argumentation des Gerichtsurteils McGirt v. Oklahoma auf, welches am selben Tag entschieden wurde.
rdf:langString
Sharp v. Murphy, 591 U.S. ___ (2020), was a Supreme Court of the United States case of whether Congress disestablished the Muscogee (Creek) Nation reservation. After holding the case from the 2018 term, the case was decided on July 9, 2020, in a per curiam decision following McGirt v. Oklahoma that, for the purposes of the Major Crimes Act, the reservations were never disestablished and remain Native American country. In 1866, Congress established reservation boundaries for the Muscogee (Creek), Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, and Seminole Nations. The Muscogee (Creek) Nation boundaries composes three million acres in Eastern Oklahoma, including most of the city of Tulsa. The boundaries for all five nations consist of over 19 million acres and nearly the entire eastern half of Oklahoma. In 1907, Congress admitted Oklahoma to the Union as the 46th state and federal territorial courts immediately transferred all non-federal cases involving Native Americans to state courts. However, in the process, it has been found that Congress never officially disestablished the tribal reservations, a requirement for a tribal reservation to lose that status as demanded under Solem v. Bartlett (1984). The situation arose following the appeal of a convicted murderer, Patrick Murphy, a member of the Muscogee-Creek tribe, with his crime taking place within the boundaries of Muscogee-Creek reservation as delimited by Congress in 1866. The appeal addressed whether the federal territorial courts had congressional authorization to make this transfer, as if the lands were still a tribal reservation, Murphy's crime would become subject to federal jurisdiction rather than Oklahoma. Although this case is specific to the Muscogee (Creek) Nation, the Court's decision is likely to also apply to reservations of the Cherokee, Choctaw, Chickasaw, and Seminole Nations because all five tribes have similar histories within the state of Oklahoma. The case was first heard by the Supreme Court in its 2018–2019 term; Justice Neil Gorsuch recused himself due to having participated as a federal appellate judge when the case was heard in lower courts, which created a potential deadlock between the remaining eight Justices. The Supreme Court announced at the end of the term that it would hold additional oral arguments during the 2019 term. It also heard a second case, McGirt v. Oklahoma, in May 2020 involving similar matters and which Justice Gorsuch had no prior conflict with.
rdf:langString
Gorsuch
rdf:langString
yes
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
29042
