Shapiro v. Thompson
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Shapiro_v._Thompson an entity of type: Thing
Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that invalidated state durational residency requirements for public assistance and helped establish a fundamental "right to travel" in U.S. law. Although the Constitution does not explicitly mention the right to travel, it is implied by the other rights given in the Constitution.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Shapiro v. Thompson
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Shapiro v. Thompson
xsd:integer
10875115
xsd:integer
1087792265
rdf:langString
Warren
rdf:langString
Harlan
rdf:langString
Black
rdf:langString
Douglas, Stewart, White, Fortas, Marshall
<second>
172800.0
rdf:langString
*Thompson v. Shapiro, 270 F. Supp. 331
*Harrell v. Tobriner, 279 F. Supp. 22
*Smith v. Reynolds, 277 F. Supp. 65
xsd:integer
618
xsd:integer
394
xsd:gMonthDay
--05-01
xsd:integer
1968
rdf:langString
Shapiro v. Thompson,
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-21
xsd:integer
1969
rdf:langString
Shapiro v. Thompson
rdf:langString
The fundamental right to travel and the Equal protection clause forbid a state from reserving welfare benefits only for persons that have resided in the state for at least a year.
rdf:langString
Shapiro v. Thompson
rdf:langString
Brennan
rdf:langString
Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that invalidated state durational residency requirements for public assistance and helped establish a fundamental "right to travel" in U.S. law. Although the Constitution does not explicitly mention the right to travel, it is implied by the other rights given in the Constitution.
rdf:langString
Stewart
xsd:gMonthDay
--10-23
xsd:integer
24
xsd:integer
1968
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
8252