Sessions v. Dimaya
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Sessions_v._Dimaya an entity of type: Thing
Sessions v. Dimaya, 584 U.S. ___ (2018), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that 18 U.S.C. § 16(b), a statute defining certain "aggravated felonies" for immigration purposes, is unconstitutionally vague. The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) classifies some categories of crimes as "aggravated felonies", and immigrants convicted of those crimes, including those legally present in the United States, are almost certain to be deported. Those categories include "crimes of violence", which are defined by the "elements clause" and the "residual clause". The Court struck down the "residual clause", which classified every felony that, "by its nature, involves a substantial risk" of "physical force against the person or property" as an aggravated felony.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Sessions v. Dimaya
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Jefferson B. Sessions, III, Attorney General, Petitioner v. James Garcia Dimaya
xsd:integer
57157443
xsd:integer
1121885572
rdf:langString
Thomas
rdf:langString
Roberts
xsd:integer
15
rdf:langString
Kennedy, Thomas, Alito
rdf:langString
Kennedy, Alito
rdf:langString
Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Gorsuch ; Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor
<second>
172800.0
<second>
25920.0
rdf:langString
___
xsd:integer
584
xsd:gMonthDay
--01-17
xsd:integer
2017
rdf:langString
Sessions v. Dimaya,
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-17
xsd:integer
2018
rdf:langString
Oral arguments were re-heard following the appointment of Justice Gorsuch, to break the deadlock.
rdf:langString
In the initial oral arguments, the case was heard as Lynch v. Dimaya.
rdf:langString
Lynch v. Dimaya oral arguments.mp3
rdf:langString
Sessions v. Dimaya oral arguments.mp3
rdf:langString
Jefferson B. Sessions, III, Attorney General, Petitioner v. James Garcia Dimaya
rdf:langString
, a statute defining certain "aggravated felonies", is unconstitutionally vague. Ninth Circuit affirmed.
rdf:langString
Sessions v. Dimaya
rdf:langString
Kagan
rdf:langString
Supreme Court
rdf:langString
Initial oral arguments
rdf:langString
Rehearing of oral arguments
rdf:langString
Sessions v. Dimaya, 584 U.S. ___ (2018), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that 18 U.S.C. § 16(b), a statute defining certain "aggravated felonies" for immigration purposes, is unconstitutionally vague. The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) classifies some categories of crimes as "aggravated felonies", and immigrants convicted of those crimes, including those legally present in the United States, are almost certain to be deported. Those categories include "crimes of violence", which are defined by the "elements clause" and the "residual clause". The Court struck down the "residual clause", which classified every felony that, "by its nature, involves a substantial risk" of "physical force against the person or property" as an aggravated felony.
rdf:langString
Gorsuch
xsd:gMonthDay
--10-02
xsd:integer
2017
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
14195