Samson v. California
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Samson_v._California an entity of type: Thing
Samson v. California, 547 U.S. 843 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court affirmed the California Court of Appeal's ruling that suspicionless searches of parolees are lawful under California law and that the search in this case was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution because it was not arbitrary, capricious, or harassing.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Samson v. California
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Donald Curtis Samson v. the State of California
xsd:integer
5628401
xsd:integer
1058632041
rdf:langString
Stevens
xsd:integer
4
rdf:langString
Souter, Breyer
rdf:langString
Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Alito
<second>
172800.0
rdf:langString
Cert. granted, .
xsd:integer
843
xsd:integer
547
xsd:gMonthDay
--02-22
xsd:integer
2006
rdf:langString
Samson v. California, 547 U.S. 843
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-19
xsd:integer
2006
rdf:langString
Donald Curtis Samson v. the State of California
rdf:langString
The Fourth Amendment does not prohibit a police officer from conducting a suspicionless search of a parolee.
rdf:langString
Samson v. California
rdf:langString
Thomas
rdf:langString
Samson v. California, 547 U.S. 843 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court affirmed the California Court of Appeal's ruling that suspicionless searches of parolees are lawful under California law and that the search in this case was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution because it was not arbitrary, capricious, or harassing. This case answered in the affirmative a variation of the question the Court left open in , 534 U.S. 112, 120 n.6 (2001), "whether a condition of release can so diminish or eliminate a released prisoner's reasonable expectation of privacy that a suspicionless search by a law enforcement officer would not offend the Fourth Amendment."
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
5097