Saenz v. Roe
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Saenz_v._Roe an entity of type: Thing
Sáenz v. Roe, 526 U.S. 489 (1999), was a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States discussed whether there is a constitutional right to travel from one state to another. The case was a reaffirmation of the principle that citizens select states and not the other way round.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Saenz v. Roe
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Rita L. Sáenz, Director, California Department of Social Services, et al., Petitioners v. Brenda Roe & Anna Doe etc.
xsd:integer
4714381
xsd:integer
1062838806
rdf:langString
Thomas
rdf:langString
Rehnquist
rdf:langString
Thomas
rdf:langString
Rehnquist
rdf:langString
O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
<second>
172800.0
<second>
25920.0
xsd:integer
489
xsd:integer
526
xsd:gMonthDay
--01-13
xsd:integer
1999
rdf:langString
Sáenz v. Roe,
xsd:gMonthDay
--05-17
xsd:integer
1999
rdf:langString
Rita L. Sáenz, Director, California Department of Social Services, et al., Petitioners v. Brenda Roe & Anna Doe etc.
rdf:langString
California statute limiting new residents' benefits for the first year they live in the state is an unconstitutional discrimination and violation of their right to travel.
rdf:langString
Sáenz v. Roe
rdf:langString
Stevens
rdf:langString
Sáenz v. Roe, 526 U.S. 489 (1999), was a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States discussed whether there is a constitutional right to travel from one state to another. The case was a reaffirmation of the principle that citizens select states and not the other way round.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
13785