Rust v. Sullivan
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Rust_v._Sullivan an entity of type: Thing
Rust v. Sullivan, 500 U.S. 173 (1991), was a case in the United States Supreme Court that upheld Department of Health and Human Services regulations prohibiting employees in federally funded family-planning facilities from counseling a patient on abortion. The department had removed all family planning programs that involving abortions. Physicians and clinics challenged this decision within the Supreme Court, arguing that the First Amendment was violated due to the implementation of this new policy. The Supreme Court, by a 5–4 verdict, allowed the regulation to go into effect, holding that the regulation was a reasonable interpretation of the Public Health Service Act, and that the First Amendment is not violated when the government merely chooses to "fund one activity to the exclusion of
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Rust v. Sullivan
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Irving Rust, et al., Petitioners v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services; New York, et al., Petitioners v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services
xsd:integer
2272710
xsd:integer
1116182569
rdf:langString
Stevens
rdf:langString
O'Connor
rdf:langString
Blackmun
rdf:langString
Marshall; Stevens ; O'Connor
rdf:langString
White, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter
rdf:langString
U.S. Const. amends. I, V; Public Health Service Act,
<second>
172800.0
<second>
17280.0
xsd:integer
173
xsd:integer
500
xsd:gMonthDay
--10-30
xsd:integer
1990
rdf:langString
Rust v. Sullivan,
xsd:gMonthDay
--05-23
xsd:integer
1991
rdf:langString
Irving Rust, et al., Petitioners v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services; New York, et al., Petitioners v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services
rdf:langString
Health and Human Services regulations prohibiting recipients of government funds from advocating, counseling, or referring patients for abortion were a permissible construction of Title X of the Act, nor did they violate the First or Fifth Amendments.
rdf:langString
Rust v. Sullivan
rdf:langString
Rehnquist
rdf:langString
Rust v. Sullivan, 500 U.S. 173 (1991), was a case in the United States Supreme Court that upheld Department of Health and Human Services regulations prohibiting employees in federally funded family-planning facilities from counseling a patient on abortion. The department had removed all family planning programs that involving abortions. Physicians and clinics challenged this decision within the Supreme Court, arguing that the First Amendment was violated due to the implementation of this new policy. The Supreme Court, by a 5–4 verdict, allowed the regulation to go into effect, holding that the regulation was a reasonable interpretation of the Public Health Service Act, and that the First Amendment is not violated when the government merely chooses to "fund one activity to the exclusion of another."
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
19034