Ring v. Arizona
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Ring_v._Arizona an entity of type: Thing
Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court applied the rule of Apprendi v. New Jersey to capital sentencing schemes, holding that the Sixth Amendment requires a jury to find the aggravating factors necessary for imposing the death penalty. Ring overruled a portion of Walton v. Arizona, which had rejected that contention.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Ring v. Arizona
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Timothy Stuart Ring v. Arizona
xsd:integer
2110530
xsd:integer
1029338030
rdf:langString
O'Connor
rdf:langString
Rehnquist
rdf:langString
Stevens, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas
<second>
172800.0
rdf:langString
On writ of cert. to the Sup. Court of Arizona. State v. Ring, 200 Ariz. 267
xsd:integer
584
xsd:integer
536
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-22
xsd:integer
2002
rdf:langString
Ring v. Arizona,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-24
xsd:integer
2002
rdf:langString
Timothy Stuart Ring v. Arizona
rdf:langString
Allowing sentencing judge, without jury, to find aggravating circumstance necessary for imposition of death penalty held to violate right to jury trial under Federal Constitution's Sixth Amendment.
rdf:langString
Ring v. Arizona
rdf:langString
Ginsburg
rdf:langString
Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court applied the rule of Apprendi v. New Jersey to capital sentencing schemes, holding that the Sixth Amendment requires a jury to find the aggravating factors necessary for imposing the death penalty. Ring overruled a portion of Walton v. Arizona, which had rejected that contention.
rdf:langString
Kennedy
rdf:langString
Breyer
rdf:langString
Scalia
rdf:langString
Thomas
rdf:langString
Walton v. Arizona
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
6971