Right to Privacy verdict

http://dbpedia.org/resource/Right_to_Privacy_verdict

Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) & Anr. vs Union Of India & Ors. (2017), also known as Right to Privacy verdict is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India, which holds that the right to privacy is protected as a fundamental right under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India. This judgment clearly settled that position of law and clarified that the Right to Privacy could be infringed only when where there was a compelling state interest for doing that. This position was same as with the other fundamental rights. rdf:langString
rdf:langString Right to Privacy verdict
rdf:langString Right to Privacy verdict
xsd:integer 55025368
xsd:integer 1115822809
rdf:langString Writ Petition No 494 of 2012; 10 SCC 1; AIR 2017 SC 4161
rdf:langString Justice K. S. Puttuswamy and Anr. vs Union Of India And Ors.
rdf:langString J.S. Khehar, J. Chelameswar, S.A. Bobde, R.K. Agrawal, Rohinton F. Nariman, A.M. Sapre, Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, Sanjay Kishan Kaul and S.A. Nazeer
rdf:langString Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) & Anr. vs Union Of India & Ors. (2017), also known as Right to Privacy verdict is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India, which holds that the right to privacy is protected as a fundamental right under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India. A nine-judge bench of J.S. Khehar, J. Chelameswar, S.A. Bobde, R.K. Agrawal, R.F. Nariman, A.M. Sapre, Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, S.K. Kaul and S.A. Nazeer unanimously held that “the right to privacy is protected as an intrinsic part of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 and as a part of the freedoms guaranteed by Part III of the Constitution”. It explicitly overrules previous judgements of the Supreme Court in Kharak Singh vs State of UP and M.P Sharma vs Union of India, which held that there is no fundamental right to privacy under the Indian Constitution. This judgment clearly settled that position of law and clarified that the Right to Privacy could be infringed only when where there was a compelling state interest for doing that. This position was same as with the other fundamental rights.
xsd:integer 9
rdf:langString All
xsd:date 2017-08-24
rdf:langString None
xsd:integer 9
rdf:langString The right to privacy is protected under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution.
rdf:langString abolishing the provisions on crime of Adultery
xsd:nonNegativeInteger 16518

data from the linked data cloud