Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Reno_v._American_Civil_Liberties_Union an entity of type: Thing
Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U.S. 844 (1997), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, unanimously ruling that anti-indecency provisions of the 1996 Communications Decency Act violated the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of speech. This was the first major Supreme Court ruling on the regulation of materials distributed via the Internet.
rdf:langString
レノ対アメリカ自由人権協会事件（レノたいアメリカじゆうじんけんきょうかいじけん、英: Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union）, 521 U.S. 844 (1997)は、1996年の通信品位法（CDA）の反みだらな表現規定が、合衆国憲法修正第1条の表現の自由の保障に違反しており、無効であるとアメリカ合衆国最高裁判所が満場一致で裁定した事件。2人の判事が部分的に同意し、部分的に決定に異議を唱えた。これは、インターネットを介して配布される資料の規制に関する最初の主要な最高裁判決だった。
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
レノ対アメリカ自由人権協会事件
rdf:langString
Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Janet Reno,Attorney General of the United States, et al. v.American Civil Liberties Union, et al.
xsd:integer
308739
xsd:integer
1108534286
xsd:integer
96
rdf:langString
Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer
rdf:langString
U.S. Const. amend. I;
<second>
172800.0
rdf:langString
Prelim. injunction granted ; expedited review by S.Ct. per CDA §561
xsd:integer
844
xsd:integer
521
xsd:gMonthDay
--03-19
xsd:integer
1997
rdf:langString
Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-26
xsd:integer
1997
rdf:langString
Janet Reno, Attorney General of the United States, et al. v. American Civil Liberties Union, et al.
rdf:langString
The Internet is entitled to the full protection that is given to other forms of media like the printed press or television and the special factors that justify governmental regulations of media broadcasts do not apply in this case. Except for child pornography or obscenity, the Communications Decency Act of 1996 is unenforceable when applied to its anti-decency measures since such provisions are overbroad. Section 502 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 is unconstitutional because it violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America.
rdf:langString
Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union
rdf:langString
Stevens
rdf:langString
Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U.S. 844 (1997), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, unanimously ruling that anti-indecency provisions of the 1996 Communications Decency Act violated the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of speech. This was the first major Supreme Court ruling on the regulation of materials distributed via the Internet.
rdf:langString
レノ対アメリカ自由人権協会事件（レノたいアメリカじゆうじんけんきょうかいじけん、英: Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union）, 521 U.S. 844 (1997)は、1996年の通信品位法（CDA）の反みだらな表現規定が、合衆国憲法修正第1条の表現の自由の保障に違反しており、無効であるとアメリカ合衆国最高裁判所が満場一致で裁定した事件。2人の判事が部分的に同意し、部分的に決定に異議を唱えた。これは、インターネットを介して配布される資料の規制に関する最初の主要な最高裁判決だった。
rdf:langString
O'Connor
rdf:langString
Rehnquist
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
11634