R v Attorney General for England and Wales

http://dbpedia.org/resource/R_v_Attorney_General_for_England_and_Wales an entity of type: SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase

"R" v Attorney General for England and Wales [2003] UKPC 22 is a New Zealand contract law case, heard by the Privy Council acting as the final court of appeal of New Zealand and not as part of the judiciary of the UK, relating to duress and undue influence. rdf:langString
rdf:langString R v Attorney General for England and Wales
rdf:langString "R" v Attorney General for England and Wales
rdf:langString (Privy Council Appeal No. 61 of 2002)
xsd:integer 29792542
xsd:integer 1091632756
rdf:langString [2003] UKPC 22, [2003] EMLR 499, [2004] 2 NZLR 577
rdf:langString "R", Appellant v. Her Majesty's Attorney-General for England and Wales, Respondent
rdf:langString
rdf:langString "R" v Attorney General for England and Wales [2003] UKPC 22 is a New Zealand contract law case, heard by the Privy Council acting as the final court of appeal of New Zealand and not as part of the judiciary of the UK, relating to duress and undue influence.
rdf:langString Lord Millett
rdf:langString Lord Steyn
xsd:date 2003-03-17
rdf:langString Lord Hoffman
rdf:langString Lord Scott of Foscote
xsd:integer 5
rdf:langString Judgment of the Court of Appeal of New Zealand UPHELD, their Lordships humbly advised Her Majesty that the appeal should be dismissed. The Attorney-General did not ask for costs.
rdf:langString Trial judge ruled that "R" had been subject to undue influence and duress when presented with an agreement for hs signature. Court of Appeal of New Zealand REVERSED IN PART by declining to enjoin against publication by "R" but allowing the Attorney-General to seek damages and recompense for breach of contract.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger 4831

data from the linked data cloud