Poe v. Ullman

http://dbpedia.org/resource/Poe_v._Ullman an entity of type: Thing

Poe v. Ullman, 367 U.S. 497 (1961), was a United States Supreme Court case that held that plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge a Connecticut law that banned the use of contraceptives and banned doctors from advising their use because the law had never been enforced. Therefore, any challenge to the law was deemed unripe because there was no actual threat of injury to anyone who disobeyed the law. The same statute would later be challenged again (successfully) in Griswold v. Connecticut. rdf:langString

포 대 울만 사건(Poe v. Ullman 367 U.S. 497 (1961))은 미국 연방대법원 판례이다. 법원은 피임도구를 사용하는 것을 금지하고 의사들이 피임을 권하는 것을 금지하는 코네티컷주법에 대해 위헌주장할 당사자적격을 결여하였다고 보았다. 그 이유로 본 주법 준수가 강제된 적이 없고 따라 법률에 대한 소송은 성숙성을 결여하였으며 당사자는 실체적 손해를 입증할 수 없기 때문이다. rdf:langString

rdfs:label

rdf:langString 포 대 울만 사건

rdf:langString Poe v. Ullman

foaf:name

rdf:langString

rdf:langString Poe et al. v. Ullman, State's Attorney

dbpedia-owl:wikiPageID

xsd:integer 1851879

dbpedia-owl:wikiPageRevisionID

xsd:integer 1124404715

dbpprop:subsequent

rdf:langString Rehearing denied, .

dbpprop:dissent

rdf:langString Douglas

rdf:langString Black

rdf:langString Stewart

rdf:langString Harlan

dbpprop:parallelcitations

<second> 172800.0

dbpprop:prior

<second> 17280.0

dbpprop:uspage

xsd:integer 497

dbpprop:usvol

xsd:integer 367

dbpprop:argueyear

xsd:integer 1961

dbpprop:case

rdf:langString Poe v. Ullman,

dbpprop:decidedate

xsd:gMonthDay --06-19

dbpprop:decideyear

xsd:integer 1961

dbpprop:fullname

rdf:langString Poe et al. v. Ullman, State's Attorney

dbpprop:holding

rdf:langString Connecticut law barring possession of birth control not ripe for constitutional challenge because of lack of enforcement.

dbpprop:litigants

rdf:langString Poe v. Ullman

dbpedia-owl:abstract

rdf:langString Poe v. Ullman, 367 U.S. 497 (1961), was a United States Supreme Court case that held that plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge a Connecticut law that banned the use of contraceptives and banned doctors from advising their use because the law had never been enforced. Therefore, any challenge to the law was deemed unripe because there was no actual threat of injury to anyone who disobeyed the law. The same statute would later be challenged again (successfully) in Griswold v. Connecticut.

rdf:langString 포 대 울만 사건(Poe v. Ullman 367 U.S. 497 (1961))은 미국 연방대법원 판례이다. 법원은 피임도구를 사용하는 것을 금지하고 의사들이 피임을 권하는 것을 금지하는 코네티컷주법에 대해 위헌주장할 당사자적격을 결여하였다고 보았다. 그 이유로 본 주법 준수가 강제된 적이 없고 따라 법률에 대한 소송은 성숙성을 결여하였으며 당사자는 실체적 손해를 입증할 수 없기 때문이다.

dbpprop:arguedatea

xsd:gMonthDay --03-01

dbpprop:arguedateb

xsd:integer 2

dbpprop:concurrence

rdf:langString Brennan

dbpprop:joinplurality

rdf:langString Warren, Clark, Whitaker

dbpprop:plurality

rdf:langString Frankfurter

dbpedia-owl:wikiPageLength

xsd:nonNegativeInteger 15773