Payne v. Tennessee
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Payne_v._Tennessee an entity of type: Thing
Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808 (1991), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that testimony in the form of a victim impact statement is admissible during the sentencing phase of a trial and, in death penalty cases, does not violate the Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause of the Eighth Amendment. Payne narrowed two of the Courts' precedents: (1987) and South Carolina v. Gathers (1989).
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Payne v. Tennessee
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Pervis Tyrone Payne v. Tennessee
xsd:integer
19428270
xsd:integer
1112179735
rdf:langString
Stevens
rdf:langString
Marshall
rdf:langString
Blackmun
rdf:langString
White, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter
<second>
172800.0
<second>
17280.0
xsd:integer
808
xsd:integer
501
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-24
xsd:integer
1991
rdf:langString
Payne v. Tennessee,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-27
xsd:integer
1991
rdf:langString
Pervis Tyrone Payne v. Tennessee
rdf:langString
The admission of a victim impact statement does not violate the Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause of the Eighth Amendment.
rdf:langString
Payne v. Tennessee
rdf:langString
Rehnquist
rdf:langString
Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808 (1991), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that testimony in the form of a victim impact statement is admissible during the sentencing phase of a trial and, in death penalty cases, does not violate the Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause of the Eighth Amendment. Payne narrowed two of the Courts' precedents: (1987) and South Carolina v. Gathers (1989).
rdf:langString
Souter
rdf:langString
O'Connor
rdf:langString
Scalia
rdf:langString
Kennedy
rdf:langString
O'Connor, Kennedy
rdf:langString
White, Kennedy
rdf:langString
South Carolina v. Gathers
rdf:langString
Booth v. Maryland
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
18574