Payne v. Tennessee

http://dbpedia.org/resource/Payne_v._Tennessee an entity of type: Thing

Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808 (1991), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that testimony in the form of a victim impact statement is admissible during the sentencing phase of a trial and, in death penalty cases, does not violate the Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause of the Eighth Amendment. Payne narrowed two of the Courts' precedents: (1987) and South Carolina v. Gathers (1989). rdf:langString
rdf:langString Payne v. Tennessee
rdf:langString
rdf:langString Pervis Tyrone Payne v. Tennessee
xsd:integer 19428270
xsd:integer 1112179735
rdf:langString Stevens
rdf:langString Marshall
rdf:langString Blackmun
rdf:langString White, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter
<second> 172800.0
<second> 17280.0
xsd:integer 808
xsd:integer 501
xsd:gMonthDay --04-24
xsd:integer 1991
rdf:langString Payne v. Tennessee,
xsd:gMonthDay --06-27
xsd:integer 1991
rdf:langString Pervis Tyrone Payne v. Tennessee
rdf:langString The admission of a victim impact statement does not violate the Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause of the Eighth Amendment.
rdf:langString Payne v. Tennessee
rdf:langString Rehnquist
rdf:langString Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808 (1991), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that testimony in the form of a victim impact statement is admissible during the sentencing phase of a trial and, in death penalty cases, does not violate the Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause of the Eighth Amendment. Payne narrowed two of the Courts' precedents: (1987) and South Carolina v. Gathers (1989).
rdf:langString Souter
rdf:langString O'Connor
rdf:langString Scalia
rdf:langString Kennedy
rdf:langString O'Connor, Kennedy
rdf:langString White, Kennedy
rdf:langString South Carolina v. Gathers
rdf:langString Booth v. Maryland
xsd:nonNegativeInteger 18574

data from the linked data cloud