New York Times Co. v. Tasini
http://dbpedia.org/resource/New_York_Times_Co._v._Tasini an entity of type: Thing
纽约时报诉塔西尼案（英語：New York Times Co. v. Tasini，533 U.S. 483 (2001)），是美国最高法院关于报纸数据库内容版权问题的一项重要判决。它认为，《纽约时报》在许可将报纸的复印刊归入律商联讯等电子数据库时，不能忽视报纸中所载的自由职业记者的作品版权。 美国汽车工人联合会（UAW）和（National Writers Union）成员对纽约时报公司、公司（Newsday Inc.）、时代公司（Time Inc.）、国际大学缩微胶片公司（University Microfilms International）和LexisNexis提起了这次诉讼。包括首席原告（Jonathan Tasini）在内的自由撰稿人指控，由于在电子媒体中使用和重复使用最初获准以印刷形式出版的文章，侵犯了自身的版权。在金斯伯格法官为首的以7比2作出的裁决中，法院确认了自由作家的版权，这些自由作者的作品最初在期刊上发表，然后由出版商提供给电子数据库，而没有得到作者的明确许可及补偿。判决结果，原告赢得了1800万美元的赔偿金。
rdf:langString
New York Times Co. v. Tasini, 533 U.S. 483 (2001), is a leading decision by the United States Supreme Court on the issue of copyright in the contents of a newspaper database. It held that The New York Times, in licensing back issues of the newspaper for inclusion in electronic databases such as LexisNexis, could not license the works of freelance journalists contained in the newspapers.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
New York Times Co. v. Tasini
rdf:langString
纽约时报诉塔西尼案
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
v.
rdf:langString
The New York Times Company, Inc., et al., Petitioners
rdf:langString
Jonathan Tasini, et al.
xsd:integer
2193317
xsd:integer
1113753386
rdf:langString
Stevens
xsd:integer
0
rdf:langString
Breyer
rdf:langString
Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas
<second>
172800.0
xsd:integer
483
xsd:integer
533
xsd:gMonthDay
--03-28
xsd:integer
2001
rdf:langString
New York Times Co. v. Tasini,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-25
xsd:integer
2001
rdf:langString
v.
rdf:langString
The New York Times Company, Inc., et al., Petitioners
rdf:langString
Jonathan Tasini, et al.
rdf:langString
Section 201 does not authorize the copying at issue here. The Publishers are not sheltered by §201 because the Databases reproduce and distribute articles standing alone and not in context, not "as part of that particular collective work" to which the author contributed, "as part of … any revision" thereof, or "as part of … any later collective work in the same series."
rdf:langString
New York Times Co. v. Tasini
rdf:langString
Ginsburg
rdf:langString
New York Times Co. v. Tasini, 533 U.S. 483 (2001), is a leading decision by the United States Supreme Court on the issue of copyright in the contents of a newspaper database. It held that The New York Times, in licensing back issues of the newspaper for inclusion in electronic databases such as LexisNexis, could not license the works of freelance journalists contained in the newspapers. The lawsuit brought by members of the UAW's National Writers Union against the New York Times Company, Newsday Inc., Time Inc., University Microfilms International, and LexisNexis. The freelance writers, including lead plaintiff Jonathan Tasini, charged copyright infringement due to the use and reuse in electronic media of articles initially licensed to be published in print form. In a 7–2 ruling delivered by Justice Ginsburg, the Court affirmed the copyright privileges of freelance writers whose works were originally published in periodicals and then provided by the publishers to electronic databases without explicit permission of, or compensation to, the writers. As a result of the decision, plaintiffs won a compensation pool of $18 million.
rdf:langString
纽约时报诉塔西尼案（英語：New York Times Co. v. Tasini，533 U.S. 483 (2001)），是美国最高法院关于报纸数据库内容版权问题的一项重要判决。它认为，《纽约时报》在许可将报纸的复印刊归入律商联讯等电子数据库时，不能忽视报纸中所载的自由职业记者的作品版权。 美国汽车工人联合会（UAW）和（National Writers Union）成员对纽约时报公司、公司（Newsday Inc.）、时代公司（Time Inc.）、国际大学缩微胶片公司（University Microfilms International）和LexisNexis提起了这次诉讼。包括首席原告（Jonathan Tasini）在内的自由撰稿人指控，由于在电子媒体中使用和重复使用最初获准以印刷形式出版的文章，侵犯了自身的版权。在金斯伯格法官为首的以7比2作出的裁决中，法院确认了自由作家的版权，这些自由作者的作品最初在期刊上发表，然后由出版商提供给电子数据库，而没有得到作者的明确许可及补偿。判决结果，原告赢得了1800万美元的赔偿金。
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
6030