National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Alston
http://dbpedia.org/resource/National_Collegiate_Athletic_Association_v._Alston an entity of type: Thing
National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Alston, 594 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning the compensation of collegiate athletes within the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). It followed from a previous case, O'Bannon v. NCAA, in which it was found that the NCAA was profiting from the namesake and likenesses of college athletes. The case dealt with the NCAA's restrictions on providing college athletes with non-cash compensation for academic-related purposes, such as computers and internships, which the NCAA maintained was to prevent the appearance that the student athletes were being paid to play or treated as professional athletes. Lower courts had ruled that these restrictions were in violation of antitrust law, which the Supreme Court affi
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Alston
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Shawne Alston, et al.
rdf:langString
American Athletic Conference, et al. v. Shawne Alston, et al.
xsd:integer
66121830
xsd:integer
1113882418
xsd:integer
20
rdf:langString
unanimous
xsd:integer
141
172800.0
<second>
25920.0
rdf:langString
___
xsd:integer
594
xsd:gMonthDay
--03-31
xsd:integer
2021
rdf:langString
National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Alston,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-21
xsd:integer
2021
rdf:langString
National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Shawne Alston, et al.
rdf:langString
American Athletic Conference, et al. v. Shawne Alston, et al.
rdf:langString
National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Alston
rdf:langString
American Athletic Conference v. Alston
rdf:langString
Gorsuch
rdf:langString
Supreme Court
rdf:langString
National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Alston, 594 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning the compensation of collegiate athletes within the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). It followed from a previous case, O'Bannon v. NCAA, in which it was found that the NCAA was profiting from the namesake and likenesses of college athletes. The case dealt with the NCAA's restrictions on providing college athletes with non-cash compensation for academic-related purposes, such as computers and internships, which the NCAA maintained was to prevent the appearance that the student athletes were being paid to play or treated as professional athletes. Lower courts had ruled that these restrictions were in violation of antitrust law, which the Supreme Court affirmed in a unanimous ruling in June 2021.
rdf:langString
Kavanaugh
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
16292