Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc.
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Moseley_v._V_Secret_Catalogue,_Inc. an entity of type: Thing
Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418 (2003), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States holding that, under the Lanham Act, a claim of trademark dilution requires proof of actual dilution. This decision was later superseded by the Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006 (TDRA).
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Victor Moseley and Cathy Moseley, dba Victor's Little Secret, v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc., et al.
xsd:integer
38042129
xsd:integer
1116547086
<second>
25920.0
xsd:integer
1
rdf:langString
unanimous
rdf:langString
Federal Trademark Dilution Act, 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125, 1127
<second>
17280.0
<second>
25920.0
xsd:integer
418
xsd:integer
537
xsd:gMonthDay
--11-12
xsd:integer
2002
rdf:langString
Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc.,
xsd:gMonthDay
--03-04
xsd:integer
2003
rdf:langString
Victor Moseley and Cathy Moseley, dba Victor's Little Secret, v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc., et al.
rdf:langString
A claim of trademark dilution requires evidence of actual dilution, not merely a likelihood of dilution
rdf:langString
Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc.
rdf:langString
Stevens
rdf:langString
Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418 (2003), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States holding that, under the Lanham Act, a claim of trademark dilution requires proof of actual dilution. This decision was later superseded by the Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006 (TDRA).
rdf:langString
Kennedy
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
10320
