Mogul Steamship Co Ltd v McGregor, Gow & Co
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Mogul_Steamship_Co_Ltd_v_McGregor,_Gow_&_Co an entity of type: Abstraction100002137
Mogul Steamship Co Ltd v McGregor, Gow & Co [1892] AC 25 is an English tort law case concerning the economic tort of conspiracy to injure. A product of its time, the courts adhered to a laissez faire doctrine allowing firms to form a cartel, which would now be seen as contrary to the Competition Act 1998. It is notable for Lord Bramwell's dictum that:
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Mogul Steamship Co Ltd v McGregor, Gow & Co
rdf:langString
Mogul Steamship Co Ltd v McGregor, Gow & Co
xsd:integer
27024427
xsd:integer
1082952907
rdf:langString
[1892] AC 25
rdf:langString
Lord Halsbury LC, Lord Watson, Lord Macnaghten, Lord Bramwell, Lord Morris, Lord Field, Lord Hannen
rdf:langString
Mogul Steamship Co Ltd v McGregor, Gow & Co [1892] AC 25 is an English tort law case concerning the economic tort of conspiracy to injure. A product of its time, the courts adhered to a laissez faire doctrine allowing firms to form a cartel, which would now be seen as contrary to the Competition Act 1998. It is notable for Lord Bramwell's dictum that: There is one thing that is to me decisive. I have always said that a combination of workmen, an agreement among them to cease work except for higher wages, and a strike in consequence, was lawful at common law; perhaps not enforceable inter se, but not indictable. The Legislature has now so declared.
xsd:integer
23
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
15892