Missouri v. Seibert
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Missouri_v._Seibert an entity of type: Thing
Missouri v. Seibert, 542 U.S. 600 (2004), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that struck down the police practice of first obtaining an inadmissible confession without giving Miranda warnings, then issuing the warnings, and then obtaining a second confession. Justice David Souter announced the judgment of the Court and wrote for a plurality of four justices that the second confession was admissible only if the intermediate Miranda warnings were "effective enough to accomplish their object." Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in a concurring opinion that the second confession should be inadmissible only if "the two-step interrogation technique was used in a calculated way to undermine the Miranda warning."
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Missouri v. Seibert
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Missouri, Petitioner v. Patrice Seibert
xsd:integer
3430036
xsd:integer
1120627013
rdf:langString
O’Connor
rdf:langString
Rehnquist, Scalia, Thomas
<second>
172800.0
<second>
25920.0
xsd:integer
600
xsd:integer
542
xsd:gMonthDay
--12-09
xsd:integer
2003
rdf:langString
Missouri v. Seibert,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-28
xsd:integer
2004
rdf:langString
Missouri, Petitioner v. Patrice Seibert
rdf:langString
Missouri's practice of interrogating suspects without reading them a Miranda warning, then reading them a Miranda warning and asking them to repeat their confession is unconstitutional.
rdf:langString
Missouri v. Seibert
rdf:langString
Missouri v. Seibert, 542 U.S. 600 (2004), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that struck down the police practice of first obtaining an inadmissible confession without giving Miranda warnings, then issuing the warnings, and then obtaining a second confession. Justice David Souter announced the judgment of the Court and wrote for a plurality of four justices that the second confession was admissible only if the intermediate Miranda warnings were "effective enough to accomplish their object." Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in a concurring opinion that the second confession should be inadmissible only if "the two-step interrogation technique was used in a calculated way to undermine the Miranda warning."
rdf:langString
Kennedy
rdf:langString
Breyer
rdf:langString
Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer
rdf:langString
Souter
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
10377