Mertens v. Hewitt Associates
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Mertens_v._Hewitt_Associates an entity of type: Thing
Mertens v. Hewitt Associates, 508 U.S. 248 (1993), is the second in the trilogy of United States Supreme Court ERISA preemption cases that effectively denies any remedy for employees who are harmed by medical malpractice or other bad acts of their health plan if they receive their health care from their employer.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Mertens v. Hewitt Associates
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
William J. Mertens, Alex W. Bandrowski, James A. Clark, and Russell Franz, Petitioners v. Hewitt Associates
xsd:integer
7110775
xsd:integer
970582854
rdf:langString
White
rdf:langString
Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor
rdf:langString
Blackmun, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas
rdf:langString
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, et seq.
<second>
172800.0
<second>
17280.0
xsd:integer
248
xsd:integer
508
xsd:gMonthDay
--02-22
xsd:integer
1993
rdf:langString
Mertens v. Hewitt Associates,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-01
xsd:integer
1993
rdf:langString
William J. Mertens, Alex W. Bandrowski, James A. Clark, and Russell Franz, Petitioners v. Hewitt Associates
rdf:langString
Mertens v. Hewitt Associates
rdf:langString
Scalia
rdf:langString
Mertens v. Hewitt Associates, 508 U.S. 248 (1993), is the second in the trilogy of United States Supreme Court ERISA preemption cases that effectively denies any remedy for employees who are harmed by medical malpractice or other bad acts of their health plan if they receive their health care from their employer.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
6344