Mertens v. Hewitt Associates

http://dbpedia.org/resource/Mertens_v._Hewitt_Associates an entity of type: Thing

Mertens v. Hewitt Associates, 508 U.S. 248 (1993), is the second in the trilogy of United States Supreme Court ERISA preemption cases that effectively denies any remedy for employees who are harmed by medical malpractice or other bad acts of their health plan if they receive their health care from their employer. rdf:langString
rdf:langString Mertens v. Hewitt Associates
rdf:langString
rdf:langString William J. Mertens, Alex W. Bandrowski, James A. Clark, and Russell Franz, Petitioners v. Hewitt Associates
xsd:integer 7110775
xsd:integer 970582854
rdf:langString White
rdf:langString Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor
rdf:langString Blackmun, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas
rdf:langString Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, et seq.
<second> 172800.0
<second> 17280.0
xsd:integer 248
xsd:integer 508
xsd:gMonthDay --02-22
xsd:integer 1993
rdf:langString Mertens v. Hewitt Associates,
xsd:gMonthDay --06-01
xsd:integer 1993
rdf:langString William J. Mertens, Alex W. Bandrowski, James A. Clark, and Russell Franz, Petitioners v. Hewitt Associates
rdf:langString Mertens v. Hewitt Associates
rdf:langString Scalia
rdf:langString Mertens v. Hewitt Associates, 508 U.S. 248 (1993), is the second in the trilogy of United States Supreme Court ERISA preemption cases that effectively denies any remedy for employees who are harmed by medical malpractice or other bad acts of their health plan if they receive their health care from their employer.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger 6344

data from the linked data cloud