Lotus Dev. Corp. v. Borland Int'l, Inc.
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Lotus_Dev._Corp._v._Borland_Int'l,_Inc. an entity of type: Thing
Lotus Dev. Corp. v. Borland Int'l, Inc., 516 U.S. 233 (1996), is a United States Supreme Court case that tested the extent of software copyright. The lower court had held that copyright does not extend to the user interface of a computer program, such as the text and layout of menus. Due to the recusal of one justice, the Supreme Court decided the case with an eight-member bench that split evenly, leaving the lower court's decision affirmed but setting no national precedent.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Lotus Dev. Corp. v. Borland Int'l, Inc.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Lotus Development Corporation v. Borland International, Inc.
xsd:integer
5676819
xsd:integer
1057308600
xsd:integer
17
<second>
172800.0
<second>
25920.0
xsd:integer
233
xsd:integer
516
xsd:gMonthDay
--01-08
xsd:integer
1996
rdf:langString
Lotus Dev. Corp. v. Borland Int'l, Inc.,
xsd:gMonthDay
--01-16
xsd:integer
1996
rdf:langString
Lotus Development Corporation v. Borland International, Inc.
rdf:langString
The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
rdf:langString
Lotus Dev. Corp. v. Borland Int'l, Inc.
rdf:langString
Lotus Dev. Corp. v. Borland Int'l, Inc., 516 U.S. 233 (1996), is a United States Supreme Court case that tested the extent of software copyright. The lower court had held that copyright does not extend to the user interface of a computer program, such as the text and layout of menus. Due to the recusal of one justice, the Supreme Court decided the case with an eight-member bench that split evenly, leaving the lower court's decision affirmed but setting no national precedent.
rdf:langString
Stevens
rdf:langString
yes
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
11864