League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry
http://dbpedia.org/resource/League_of_United_Latin_American_Citizens_v._Perry an entity of type: Thing
League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006), is a Supreme Court of the United States case in which the Court ruled that only District 23 of the 2003 Texas redistricting violated the Voting Rights Act. The Court refused to throw out the entire plan, ruling that the plaintiffs failed to state a sufficient claim of partisan gerrymandering.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
League of United Latin American Citizens, et al. v.Rick Perry,Governor of Texas, et al.
xsd:integer
5745458
xsd:integer
1103956217
<second>
172800.0
xsd:integer
5
rdf:langString
Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
<second>
172800.0
<second>
172800.0
xsd:integer
399
xsd:integer
548
xsd:gMonthDay
--03-01
xsd:integer
2006
rdf:langString
League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-28
xsd:integer
2006
rdf:langString
League of United Latin American Citizens, et al. v. Rick Perry, Governor of Texas, et al.
rdf:langString
Texas's redrawing of District 23’s lines amounts to vote dilution violative of §2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, while other newly created districts remain constitutional. The judgment is affirmed in part, reversed in part, vacated in part, and remanded.
rdf:langString
League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry
rdf:langString
Kennedy
rdf:langString
League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006), is a Supreme Court of the United States case in which the Court ruled that only District 23 of the 2003 Texas redistricting violated the Voting Rights Act. The Court refused to throw out the entire plan, ruling that the plaintiffs failed to state a sufficient claim of partisan gerrymandering. The opinion requires lawmakers to adjust Congressional district boundaries in comport with the Court's ruling, though the ruling ultimately did not substantially reduce or reverse the Republican gains as a result of the redistricting in Texas. The Court also declined to resolve a dispute over whether partisan gerrymandering claims present nonjusticiable political questions.
rdf:langString
Souter
rdf:langString
Stevens
rdf:langString
Roberts
rdf:langString
Breyer
rdf:langString
Scalia
rdf:langString
Breyer
rdf:langString
Ginsburg
rdf:langString
Alito
rdf:langString
Thomas; Roberts, Alito
rdf:langString
Souter, Ginsburg
rdf:langString
Roberts, Alito
rdf:langString
Kennedy
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
14631