Kidd v. Pearson
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Kidd_v._Pearson an entity of type: Thing
Kidd v. Pearson, 128 U.S. 1 (1888), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a distinction between manufacturing and commerce meant that an Iowa law that prohibited the manufacture of alcohol (in this case for sale out-of-state) was constitutional as it did not conflict with the power of the US Congress to regulate interstate commerce.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Kidd v. Pearson
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
J. S. Kidd v. I. E. Pearson
xsd:integer
7625159
xsd:integer
1045130299
rdf:langString
None
rdf:langString
Miller, Field, Bradley, Harlan, Matthews, Gray, Blatchford
xsd:integer
9
rdf:langString
Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Iowa
xsd:integer
1
xsd:integer
128
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-04
xsd:integer
1888
rdf:langString
Kidd v. Pearson,
xsd:gMonthDay
--10-22
xsd:integer
1888
rdf:langString
J. S. Kidd v. I. E. Pearson
rdf:langString
There is no conflict and the state law is valid. The Court erected a distinction between manufacture and commerce. The state law regulated manufacturing only. A broad view of commerce that embraces manufacturing would also embrace the power to regulate "every branch of human industry."
rdf:langString
Kidd v. Pearson
rdf:langString
Lamar
rdf:langString
Kidd v. Pearson, 128 U.S. 1 (1888), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a distinction between manufacturing and commerce meant that an Iowa law that prohibited the manufacture of alcohol (in this case for sale out-of-state) was constitutional as it did not conflict with the power of the US Congress to regulate interstate commerce.
rdf:langString
Fuller
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
3489