Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Jones_v._Alfred_H._Mayer_Co. an entity of type: Thing
Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., 392 U.S. 409 (1968), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case, which held that Congress could regulate the sale of private property to prevent racial discrimination: "[42 U.S.C. § 1982] bars all racial discrimination, private as well as public, in the sale or rental of property, and that the statute, thus construed, is a valid exercise of the power of Congress to enforce the Thirteenth Amendment." The Civil Rights Act of 1866 (passed by Congress over the veto of Andrew Johnson) provided the basis for this decision as embodied by 42 U.S.C. § 1982.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Joseph Lee Jones et ux. v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. et al.
xsd:integer
3222343
xsd:integer
1118835797
rdf:langString
Harlan
rdf:langString
White
rdf:langString
Warren, Black, Douglas, Brennan, Fortas, Marshall
<second>
172800.0
rdf:langString
Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
xsd:integer
409
xsd:integer
392
xsd:integer
1968
rdf:langString
Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-17
xsd:integer
1968
rdf:langString
Joseph Lee Jones et ux. v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. et al.
rdf:langString
The Thirteenth Amendment allows Congress to regulate the sale of private property to prevent racial discrimination, as such racial discrimination is a badge of slavery.
rdf:langString
Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.
rdf:langString
Stewart
rdf:langString
Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., 392 U.S. 409 (1968), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case, which held that Congress could regulate the sale of private property to prevent racial discrimination: "[42 U.S.C. § 1982] bars all racial discrimination, private as well as public, in the sale or rental of property, and that the statute, thus construed, is a valid exercise of the power of Congress to enforce the Thirteenth Amendment." The Civil Rights Act of 1866 (passed by Congress over the veto of Andrew Johnson) provided the basis for this decision as embodied by 42 U.S.C. § 1982. Reversing many precedents, the Supreme Court held that the Civil Rights Act of 1866 prohibited both private and state-backed discrimination and that the 13th Amendment authorized Congress to prohibit private acts of discrimination as among "the badges and incidents of slavery." Congress possessed the power to "determine what are the badges and incidents of slavery, and the authority to translate that determination into effective legislation."
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-01
xsd:integer
2
rdf:langString
Douglas
rdf:langString
Hodges v. United States, 203 U.S. 1 , & Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
5927