J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B.
http://dbpedia.org/resource/J.E.B._v._Alabama_ex_rel._T.B. an entity of type: Thing
J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B., 511 U.S. 127 (1994), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States holding that peremptory challenges based solely on a prospective juror's sex are unconstitutional. J.E.B. extended the court's existing precedent in Batson v. Kentucky (1986), which found race-based peremptory challenges in criminal trials unconstitutional, and Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Company (1991), which extended that principle to civil trials. As in Batson, the court found that sex-based challenges violate the Equal Protection Clause.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
J. E. B., Petitioner v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.
xsd:integer
14000163
xsd:integer
1105805267
rdf:langString
Rehnquist
rdf:langString
Scalia
rdf:langString
Rehnquist, Thomas
rdf:langString
Stevens, O'Connor, Souter, Ginsburg
<second>
172800.0
<second>
17280.0
xsd:integer
127
xsd:integer
511
xsd:gMonthDay
--11-02
xsd:integer
1993
rdf:langString
J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.,
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-19
xsd:integer
1994
rdf:langString
J. E. B., Petitioner v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.
rdf:langString
Intentional discrimination on the basis of gender by state actors in the use of peremptory strikes in jury selection violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment.
rdf:langString
J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.
rdf:langString
Blackmun
rdf:langString
J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B., 511 U.S. 127 (1994), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States holding that peremptory challenges based solely on a prospective juror's sex are unconstitutional. J.E.B. extended the court's existing precedent in Batson v. Kentucky (1986), which found race-based peremptory challenges in criminal trials unconstitutional, and Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Company (1991), which extended that principle to civil trials. As in Batson, the court found that sex-based challenges violate the Equal Protection Clause.
rdf:langString
Kennedy
rdf:langString
O'Connor
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
5048