International News Service v. Associated Press
http://dbpedia.org/resource/International_News_Service_v._Associated_Press an entity of type: Thing
L'Arrêt International News Service contre Associated Press est un arrêt de la Cour suprême des États-Unis pris en 1918. Il pose la question du droit d'une agence de presse à reproduire les nouvelles diffusées par une autre agence sans payer. La Cour suprême répondit que l'Associated Press avait le droit de protéger le coût de la recherche de l'information car ne pas le payer du tout rendrait sa recherche prohibitif.
rdf:langString
International News Service v. Associated Press, 248 U.S. 215 (1918), also known as INS v. AP or simply the INS case, is a 1918 decision of the United States Supreme Court that enunciated the misappropriation doctrine of federal intellectual property common law—that a "quasi-property right" may be created against others by one's investment of effort and money in an intangible thing, such as information or a design. The doctrine is highly controversial and criticized by many legal scholars, but it has its supporters.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
International News Service v. Associated Press
rdf:langString
International News Service v. Associated Press
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
International News Service v. Associated Press
xsd:integer
1934634
xsd:integer
1084316851
rdf:langString
Holmes
rdf:langString
Brandeis
rdf:langString
McKenna
rdf:langString
White, Day, Van Devanter, McReynolds
xsd:integer
39
xsd:integer
215
xsd:integer
248
xsd:integer
1918
rdf:langString
International News Service v. Associated Press,
xsd:gMonthDay
--12-23
xsd:integer
1918
rdf:langString
International News Service v. Associated Press
rdf:langString
While the information found in AP news was not copyrightable and subject to publici juris, AP has a quasi-property interest during the production of "hot news".
rdf:langString
International News Service v. Associated Press
rdf:langString
Pitney
rdf:langString
International News Service v. Associated Press, 248 U.S. 215 (1918), also known as INS v. AP or simply the INS case, is a 1918 decision of the United States Supreme Court that enunciated the misappropriation doctrine of federal intellectual property common law—that a "quasi-property right" may be created against others by one's investment of effort and money in an intangible thing, such as information or a design. The doctrine is highly controversial and criticized by many legal scholars, but it has its supporters. The INS decision recognized the doctrine of U.S. copyright law that there is no copyright in facts, which the Supreme Court later greatly elaborated in the Feist case in 1991, but nonetheless INS extended the prior law of unfair competition to cover an additional type of interference with business expectations: "misappropriation" of the product of "sweat of the brow." The case was decided during a period when a body of federal common law existed for business practices and torts, which the Supreme Court had power to declare or create, but two decades later the Supreme Court abolished that body of substantive law and held that state law must govern the field henceforth. Accordingly, the INS case no longer has precedential force, although state courts are free to follow its reasoning if they so choose.
rdf:langString
L'Arrêt International News Service contre Associated Press est un arrêt de la Cour suprême des États-Unis pris en 1918. Il pose la question du droit d'une agence de presse à reproduire les nouvelles diffusées par une autre agence sans payer. La Cour suprême répondit que l'Associated Press avait le droit de protéger le coût de la recherche de l'information car ne pas le payer du tout rendrait sa recherche prohibitif.
xsd:gMonthDay
--05-02
xsd:integer
3
rdf:langString
Clarke
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc.
rdf:langString
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
38816
