Huddleston v. United States
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Huddleston_v._United_States an entity of type: Thing
Huddleston v. United States, 485 U.S. 681 (1988), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that before admitting evidence of extrinsic acts under Rule 404(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, federal courts should assess the evidence's sufficiency under Federal Rule of Evidence 104(b). Under 104(b), "[w]hen the relevancy of evidence depends upon the fulfillment of a condition of fact, the court shall admit it upon, or subject to, the introduction of evidence sufficient to support a finding of the fulfillment of the condition."
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Huddleston v. United States
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Guy Rufus Huddleston v. United States of America
xsd:integer
8524664
xsd:integer
1057697761
rdf:langString
unanimous
rdf:langString
Fed. R. Evid. 404
<second>
172800.0
<second>
17280.0
xsd:integer
681
xsd:integer
485
xsd:gMonthDay
--03-23
xsd:integer
1988
rdf:langString
Huddleston v. United States,
xsd:gMonthDay
--05-02
xsd:integer
1988
rdf:langString
Guy Rufus Huddleston v. United States of America
rdf:langString
Evidence of other acts is admissible in federal court to show motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, or identity, and without a threshold determination that the acts have been proven.
rdf:langString
Huddleston v. United States
rdf:langString
Rehnquist
rdf:langString
Huddleston v. United States, 485 U.S. 681 (1988), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that before admitting evidence of extrinsic acts under Rule 404(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, federal courts should assess the evidence's sufficiency under Federal Rule of Evidence 104(b). Under 104(b), "[w]hen the relevancy of evidence depends upon the fulfillment of a condition of fact, the court shall admit it upon, or subject to, the introduction of evidence sufficient to support a finding of the fulfillment of the condition."
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
8242