Hill v. Colorado

http://dbpedia.org/resource/Hill_v._Colorado an entity of type: Thing

Hill v. Colorado, 530 U.S. 703 (2000), was a United States Supreme Court decision. The Court ruled 6–3 that the First Amendment right to free speech was not violated by a Colorado law limiting protest, education, distribution of literature, or counseling within eight feet of a person entering a healthcare facility. rdf:langString
rdf:langString Hill v. Colorado
rdf:langString
rdf:langString Hill, et al. v. Colorado, et al.
xsd:integer 14225074
xsd:integer 1096714724
rdf:langString Statute upheld.
rdf:langString Kennedy
rdf:langString Scalia
rdf:langString Thomas
rdf:langString Rehnquist, O’Connor, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
<second> 172800.0
xsd:integer 703
xsd:integer 530
xsd:gMonthDay --01-19
xsd:integer 2000
rdf:langString Hill v. Colorado,
xsd:gMonthDay --06-28
xsd:integer 2000
rdf:langString Hill, et al. v. Colorado, et al.
rdf:langString A statute limiting protest, education, or distribution of literature or counseling within eight feet of a person entering a health-care facility is constitutional.
rdf:langString Hill v. Colorado
rdf:langString Stevens
rdf:langString Hill v. Colorado, 530 U.S. 703 (2000), was a United States Supreme Court decision. The Court ruled 6–3 that the First Amendment right to free speech was not violated by a Colorado law limiting protest, education, distribution of literature, or counseling within eight feet of a person entering a healthcare facility.
rdf:langString Souter
rdf:langString O’Connor, Ginsburg, Breyer
xsd:nonNegativeInteger 6503

data from the linked data cloud