Hill v. Colorado
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Hill_v._Colorado an entity of type: Thing
Hill v. Colorado, 530 U.S. 703 (2000), was a United States Supreme Court decision. The Court ruled 6–3 that the First Amendment right to free speech was not violated by a Colorado law limiting protest, education, distribution of literature, or counseling within eight feet of a person entering a healthcare facility.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Hill v. Colorado
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Hill, et al. v. Colorado, et al.
xsd:integer
14225074
xsd:integer
1096714724
rdf:langString
Statute upheld.
rdf:langString
Kennedy
rdf:langString
Scalia
rdf:langString
Thomas
rdf:langString
Rehnquist, O’Connor, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
<second>
172800.0
xsd:integer
703
xsd:integer
530
xsd:gMonthDay
--01-19
xsd:integer
2000
rdf:langString
Hill v. Colorado,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-28
xsd:integer
2000
rdf:langString
Hill, et al. v. Colorado, et al.
rdf:langString
A statute limiting protest, education, or distribution of literature or counseling within eight feet of a person entering a health-care facility is constitutional.
rdf:langString
Hill v. Colorado
rdf:langString
Stevens
rdf:langString
Hill v. Colorado, 530 U.S. 703 (2000), was a United States Supreme Court decision. The Court ruled 6–3 that the First Amendment right to free speech was not violated by a Colorado law limiting protest, education, distribution of literature, or counseling within eight feet of a person entering a healthcare facility.
rdf:langString
Souter
rdf:langString
O’Connor, Ginsburg, Breyer
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
6503