Herring v. United States
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Herring_v._United_States an entity of type: Thing
Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135 (2009), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on January 14, 2009. The court decided that the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies when a police officer makes an arrest based on an outstanding warrant in another jurisdiction, but the information regarding that warrant is later found to be incorrect because of a negligent error by that agency.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Herring v. United States
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Bennie Dean Herring, Plaintiff, v. United States of America
xsd:integer
16022163
xsd:integer
1026250350
rdf:langString
Rehearing denied, .
rdf:langString
Breyer
rdf:langString
Ginsburg
xsd:integer
7
rdf:langString
Souter
rdf:langString
Stevens, Souter, Breyer
rdf:langString
Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito
<second>
172800.0
<second>
25920.0
xsd:integer
135
xsd:integer
555
xsd:gMonthDay
--10-07
xsd:integer
2008
rdf:langString
Herring v. United States,
xsd:gMonthDay
--01-14
xsd:integer
2009
rdf:langString
Bennie Dean Herring, Plaintiff, v. United States of America
rdf:langString
Evidence obtained after illegal searches or arrests based on simple police mistakes that are not the result of repeated patterns or flagrant misconduct cannot have the exclusionary rule used to suppress evidence. Convictions upheld.
rdf:langString
Herring v. United States
rdf:langString
Roberts
rdf:langString
Supreme Court
rdf:langString
Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135 (2009), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on January 14, 2009. The court decided that the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies when a police officer makes an arrest based on an outstanding warrant in another jurisdiction, but the information regarding that warrant is later found to be incorrect because of a negligent error by that agency.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
13939