Gratz v. Bollinger
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Gratz_v._Bollinger an entity of type: Thing
Gratz v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244 (2003), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the University of Michigan undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy. In a 6–3 decision announced on June 23, 2003, Chief Justice Rehnquist, writing for the Court, ruled the University's point system's "predetermined point allocations" that awarded 20 points towards admission to underrepresented minorities "ensures that the diversity contributions of applicants cannot be individually assessed" and was therefore unconstitutional.
rdf:langString
格拉茨訴布林格案（Gratz v. Bollinger），539 US 244 (2003)，是美国最高法院就密西根大学本科肯定性行动招生政策所做出的案件裁決。2003年6月23日，美國首席大法官威廉·伦奎斯特宣讀判決書，表示最高法院以6-3的比數裁定该大学給少數族裔申請者加分20分的作法违宪，不過最高法院又以5-4的比數裁決學校为了增加学生的多样性而照顾少数种族的政策是合法的。
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Gratz v. Bollinger
rdf:langString
格拉茨訴布林格案
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Jennifer Gratz and Patrick Hamacher v.Lee Bollinger, et al.
xsd:integer
253179
xsd:integer
1093671885
rdf:langString
On remand, 80 Fed. App'x 417
rdf:langString
Souter
rdf:langString
Stevens
rdf:langString
Ginsburg
xsd:integer
2
rdf:langString
Souter
rdf:langString
Ginsburg
rdf:langString
Souter, Breyer
rdf:langString
O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas
<second>
172800.0
<second>
25920.0
xsd:integer
244
xsd:integer
539
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-01
xsd:integer
2003
rdf:langString
Gratz v. Bollinger,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-23
xsd:integer
2003
rdf:langString
Jennifer Gratz and Patrick Hamacher v. Lee Bollinger, et al.
rdf:langString
A state university's admission policy violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because its ranking system gave an automatic point increase to all racial minorities rather than making individual determinations.
rdf:langString
Gratz v. Bollinger
rdf:langString
Rehnquist
rdf:langString
Gratz v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244 (2003), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the University of Michigan undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy. In a 6–3 decision announced on June 23, 2003, Chief Justice Rehnquist, writing for the Court, ruled the University's point system's "predetermined point allocations" that awarded 20 points towards admission to underrepresented minorities "ensures that the diversity contributions of applicants cannot be individually assessed" and was therefore unconstitutional.
rdf:langString
格拉茨訴布林格案（Gratz v. Bollinger），539 US 244 (2003)，是美国最高法院就密西根大学本科肯定性行动招生政策所做出的案件裁決。2003年6月23日，美國首席大法官威廉·伦奎斯特宣讀判決書，表示最高法院以6-3的比數裁定该大学給少數族裔申請者加分20分的作法违宪，不過最高法院又以5-4的比數裁決學校为了增加学生的多样性而照顾少数种族的政策是合法的。
rdf:langString
Thomas
rdf:langString
O'Connor
rdf:langString
Breyer
rdf:langString
Breyer
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
8770