Grady v. Corbin
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Grady_v._Corbin an entity of type: Thing
Grady v. Corbin, 495 U.S. 508 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court decision holding that: "the Double Jeopardy Clause bars a subsequent prosecution if, to establish an essential element of an offense charged in that prosecution, the government will prove conduct that constitutes an offense for which the defendant has already been prosecuted."
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Grady v. Corbin
rdf:langString
William V. Grady, District Attorney of Dutchess County v. Thomas J. Corbin
xsd:integer
19087317
xsd:integer
1110018873
rdf:langString
O'Connor
rdf:langString
Scalia
rdf:langString
Rehnquist, Kennedy
rdf:langString
White, Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens
<second>
172800.0
rdf:langString
Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York
xsd:integer
508
xsd:integer
495
xsd:gMonthDay
--03-21
xsd:integer
1990
rdf:langString
Grady v. Corbin,
xsd:gMonthDay
--05-29
xsd:integer
1990
rdf:langString
William V. Grady, District Attorney of Dutchess County v. Thomas J. Corbin
rdf:langString
The Double Jeopardy Clause bars a subsequent prosecution if, to establish an essential element of an offense charged in that prosecution, the government will prove conduct that constitutes an offense for which the defendant has already been prosecuted.
rdf:langString
Grady v. Corbin
rdf:langString
Brennan
rdf:langString
Grady v. Corbin, 495 U.S. 508 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court decision holding that: "the Double Jeopardy Clause bars a subsequent prosecution if, to establish an essential element of an offense charged in that prosecution, the government will prove conduct that constitutes an offense for which the defendant has already been prosecuted."
rdf:langString
.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
4949