Gibbons v. Ogden
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Gibbons_v._Ogden an entity of type: Thing
기번스 대 옥덴 사건(Gibbons v. Ogden)은 통상조항관련 미국의 유명 대법원 판례이다. 뉴욕주는 주법에 의하여 리빙스턴과 풀턴에게 주내 모든 수로를 이용하고 항해할 수 있는 독점사업권을 부여하였다. 이들을 이 권리를 옥덴에게 다시 주었는데 한편 기번스는 뉴욕주와 뉴저지주 간의 여객운송업을 임의로 개시하였는바, 옥덴은 기번스를 자신의 독점사업권 침해로 제소하였다.
rdf:langString
Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. (9 Wheat.) 1 (1824), was a landmark decision in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the power to regulate interstate commerce, which was granted to Congress by the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, encompassed the power to regulate navigation. The decision is credited with supporting the economic growth of the antebellum United States and the creation of national markets. Gibbons v. Ogden has since provided the basis for Congress' regulation of railroads, freeways and television and radio broadcasts.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Gibbons v. Ogden
rdf:langString
기번스 대 옥덴 사건
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Thomas Gibbons, Appellant v. Aaron Ogden, Respondent
rdf:langString
Gibbons v. Ogden
xsd:integer
146273
xsd:integer
1121641738
rdf:langString
Washington, Todd, Duvall, Story
xsd:integer
9
rdf:langString
Appeal from the Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors of the State of New York
xsd:integer
1
xsd:integer
22
xsd:gMonthDay
--02-05
xsd:integer
1824
rdf:langString
Gibbons v. Ogden,
xsd:gMonthDay
--03-02
xsd:integer
1824
rdf:langString
Thomas Gibbons, Appellant v. Aaron Ogden, Respondent
rdf:langString
New York law was invalid because the Commerce Clause of the Constitution designated power to Congress to regulate interstate commerce and the broad definition of commerce included navigation.
rdf:langString
gov.ntis.AV010230VM00
rdf:langString
Gibbons v. Ogden
rdf:langString
Marshall
rdf:langString
Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. (9 Wheat.) 1 (1824), was a landmark decision in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the power to regulate interstate commerce, which was granted to Congress by the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, encompassed the power to regulate navigation. The decision is credited with supporting the economic growth of the antebellum United States and the creation of national markets. Gibbons v. Ogden has since provided the basis for Congress' regulation of railroads, freeways and television and radio broadcasts. The case was argued by some of America's most admired and capable attorneys at the time. The exiled Irish patriot Thomas Addis Emmet and Thomas J. Oakley argued for Ogden, and U.S. Attorney General William Wirt and Daniel Webster argued for Gibbons.
rdf:langString
기번스 대 옥덴 사건(Gibbons v. Ogden)은 통상조항관련 미국의 유명 대법원 판례이다. 뉴욕주는 주법에 의하여 리빙스턴과 풀턴에게 주내 모든 수로를 이용하고 항해할 수 있는 독점사업권을 부여하였다. 이들을 이 권리를 옥덴에게 다시 주었는데 한편 기번스는 뉴욕주와 뉴저지주 간의 여객운송업을 임의로 개시하였는바, 옥덴은 기번스를 자신의 독점사업권 침해로 제소하였다.
rdf:langString
Johnson
rdf:langString
Thompson
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
13189