Garza v. Idaho
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Garza_v._Idaho an entity of type: Thing
Garza v. Idaho, 586 U.S. ___, 139 S. Ct. 738 (2019), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that the presumption of prejudice for Sixth Amendment purposes applies regardless of whether a defendant has waived the right to appeal.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Garza v. Idaho
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Gilberto Garza Jr., Petitioner, v. State of Idaho, Respondent.
xsd:integer
62019204
xsd:integer
1118216181
rdf:langString
Thomas
xsd:integer
17
rdf:langString
Gorsuch; Alito
rdf:langString
Roberts, Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan, Kavanaugh
xsd:integer
139
rdf:langString
___
xsd:integer
586
xsd:gMonthDay
--10-30
xsd:integer
2018
rdf:langString
Garza v. Idaho
xsd:gMonthDay
--02-27
xsd:integer
2019
rdf:langString
Gilberto Garza Jr., Petitioner, v. State of Idaho, Respondent.
rdf:langString
The presumption of prejudice as recognized in Roe v. Flores-Ortega applies regardless of whether a defendant has waived the right to appeal.
rdf:langString
Garza v. Idaho
rdf:langString
Sotomayor
rdf:langString
Supreme Court
rdf:langString
Garza v. Idaho, 586 U.S. ___, 139 S. Ct. 738 (2019), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that the presumption of prejudice for Sixth Amendment purposes applies regardless of whether a defendant has waived the right to appeal.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
5560