Fulton v. City of Philadelphia
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Fulton_v._City_of_Philadelphia an entity of type: Thing
フルトン対フィラデルフィア市事件（Fulton v. City of Philadelphia）は、アメリカ合衆国憲法修正第1条規定された信教の自由条項と国教樹立禁止条項をめぐって争われた、合衆国最高裁判所の訴訟。 この訴訟では、結婚した同性カップルが里親になることを、宗教的な理由で拒否した機関が、ペンシルベニア州フィラデルフィア市によって排除された事件を扱っている。2021年6月17日に最高裁は、同性カップルへの方針を理由にフィラデルフィア市が宗教機関を排除したことは、信教の自由条項に反しているという判決を満場一致で下した。
rdf:langString
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, 593 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with litigation over discrimination of local regulations based on the Free Exercise Clause and Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The specific case deals with a religious-backed foster care agency that was denied a new contract by the City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, due to the agency's refusal to certify married same-sex couples as foster parents on religious grounds.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia
rdf:langString
フルトン対フィラデルフィア市事件
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Sharonell Fulton, et al., Petitioners v. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, et al.
xsd:integer
64939552
xsd:integer
1121543514
xsd:integer
19
rdf:langString
Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh, Barrett
xsd:integer
141
172800.0
<second>
25920.0
rdf:langString
___
xsd:integer
593
xsd:gMonthDay
--11-04
xsd:integer
2020
rdf:langString
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-17
xsd:integer
2021
rdf:langString
Sharonell Fulton, et al., Petitioners v. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, et al.
rdf:langString
The refusal of Philadelphia to contract with CSS for the provision of foster care services unless CSS agrees to certify same-sex couples as foster parents violates the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment
rdf:langString
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia
rdf:langString
Roberts
rdf:langString
Supreme Court
rdf:langString
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, 593 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with litigation over discrimination of local regulations based on the Free Exercise Clause and Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The specific case deals with a religious-backed foster care agency that was denied a new contract by the City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, due to the agency's refusal to certify married same-sex couples as foster parents on religious grounds. In a unanimous judgment on June 17, 2021, the Court ruled that the city's refusal due to the agency's same-sex couple policy violated the Free Exercise Clause. The case was decided on narrow grounds outside of the Supreme Court's prior decision in Employment Division v. Smith, which had previously ruled that neutral laws of general applicability could not be challenged for violating religious exemptions. Instead, in Fulton, the court ruled that services like foster care contracting were not public accommodations covered by Smith, and thus were subject to strict scrutiny review. Because the city allowed for exceptions to be made in its anti-discrimination policy for foster care certification, the Court deemed the city's policy to violate the foster case agency's free exercise of religion under Smith.
rdf:langString
フルトン対フィラデルフィア市事件（Fulton v. City of Philadelphia）は、アメリカ合衆国憲法修正第1条規定された信教の自由条項と国教樹立禁止条項をめぐって争われた、合衆国最高裁判所の訴訟。 この訴訟では、結婚した同性カップルが里親になることを、宗教的な理由で拒否した機関が、ペンシルベニア州フィラデルフィア市によって排除された事件を扱っている。2021年6月17日に最高裁は、同性カップルへの方針を理由にフィラデルフィア市が宗教機関を排除したことは、信教の自由条項に反しているという判決を満場一致で下した。
rdf:langString
Barrett
rdf:langString
Alito
rdf:langString
Gorsuch
rdf:langString
Thomas, Alito
rdf:langString
Thomas, Gorsuch
rdf:langString
Kavanaugh; Breyer
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
34208