Escobedo v. Illinois
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Escobedo_v._Illinois an entity of type: Thing
Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case holding that criminal suspects have a right to counsel during police interrogations under the Sixth Amendment. The case was decided a year after the court had held in Gideon v. Wainwright that indigent criminal defendants have a right to be provided counsel at trial.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Escobedo v. Illinois
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Escobedo v. Illinois
xsd:integer
1170034
xsd:integer
1122202773
rdf:langString
reversed and remanded
rdf:langString
Stewart
rdf:langString
White
rdf:langString
Harlan
rdf:langString
Stewart, Clark
rdf:langString
Warren, Black, Douglas, Brennan
rdf:langString
U.S. Const. amends. VI, XIV
<second>
172800.0
<second>
172800.0
xsd:integer
478
xsd:integer
378
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-29
xsd:integer
1964
rdf:langString
Escobedo v. Illinois,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-22
xsd:integer
1964
rdf:langString
Escobedo v. Illinois
rdf:langString
If a police investigation begins to focus on a particular suspect, his statements to the police are excluded if he has been refused counsel.
rdf:langString
Escobedo v. Illinois
rdf:langString
Goldberg
rdf:langString
Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case holding that criminal suspects have a right to counsel during police interrogations under the Sixth Amendment. The case was decided a year after the court had held in Gideon v. Wainwright that indigent criminal defendants have a right to be provided counsel at trial.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
7694