Escobedo v. Illinois

http://dbpedia.org/resource/Escobedo_v._Illinois an entity of type: Thing

Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case holding that criminal suspects have a right to counsel during police interrogations under the Sixth Amendment. The case was decided a year after the court had held in Gideon v. Wainwright that indigent criminal defendants have a right to be provided counsel at trial. rdf:langString
rdf:langString Escobedo v. Illinois
rdf:langString
rdf:langString Escobedo v. Illinois
xsd:integer 1170034
xsd:integer 1122202773
rdf:langString reversed and remanded
rdf:langString Stewart
rdf:langString White
rdf:langString Harlan
rdf:langString Stewart, Clark
rdf:langString Warren, Black, Douglas, Brennan
rdf:langString U.S. Const. amends. VI, XIV
<second> 172800.0
<second> 172800.0
xsd:integer 478
xsd:integer 378
xsd:gMonthDay --04-29
xsd:integer 1964
rdf:langString Escobedo v. Illinois,
xsd:gMonthDay --06-22
xsd:integer 1964
rdf:langString Escobedo v. Illinois
rdf:langString If a police investigation begins to focus on a particular suspect, his statements to the police are excluded if he has been refused counsel.
rdf:langString Escobedo v. Illinois
rdf:langString Goldberg
rdf:langString Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case holding that criminal suspects have a right to counsel during police interrogations under the Sixth Amendment. The case was decided a year after the court had held in Gideon v. Wainwright that indigent criminal defendants have a right to be provided counsel at trial.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger 7694

data from the linked data cloud