Elkins v. United States
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Elkins_v._United_States an entity of type: Thing
埃尔金斯诉合众国案（英語：Elkins v. United States， U.S. 206 (1960)）是美国联邦最高法院1960年裁决的案件，判决认为“银盘理论”（silver platter doctrine）违反美利坚合众国宪法第四条修正案，该理论认为联邦法庭可以接纳州执法部门通过非法手段获得的证据。 俄勒冈州波特兰的警察通过一份不相关的搜查令从詹姆斯·巴特勒·埃尔金斯（James Butler Elkins）家中查获一些非法窃听的证据，埃尔金斯随后因这些证据而被联邦法庭判决有罪。他提出上诉，辩称根据第四条修正案下的證據排除法則，这些证据应该是不能够呈庭的。 最高法院以5比4的投票结果推翻银盘理论及埃尔金斯的定罪。大法官波特·斯图尔特起草多数意见，大法官费利克斯·弗兰克福特和約翰·馬歇爾·哈倫二世持反对意见。埃尔金斯诉合众国案对第四条修正案作出更宽泛的合理解读，为1961年的铺平道路，后者将把证据排除法则应用到各州。
rdf:langString
Elkins v. United States, 364 U.S. 206 (1960), was a US Supreme Court decision that held the "silver platter doctrine", which allowed federal prosecutors to use evidence illegally gathered by state police, to be a violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Elkins v. United States
rdf:langString
埃尔金斯诉合众国案
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
James Butler Elkins and Raymond Frederick Clark v. United States of America
xsd:integer
40151468
xsd:integer
1063979386
rdf:langString
New trial ordered on remand, 195 F. Supp. 757 .
rdf:langString
Harlan
rdf:langString
Frankfurter
rdf:langString
Clark, Whittaker
rdf:langString
Harlan, Clark, Whittaker
rdf:langString
Warren, Black, Douglas, Brennan
<second>
172800.0
<second>
17280.0
xsd:integer
206
xsd:integer
364
xsd:gMonthDay
--03-28
xsd:integer
1960
rdf:langString
Elkins v. United States,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-27
xsd:integer
1960
rdf:langString
James Butler Elkins and Raymond Frederick Clark v. United States of America
rdf:langString
Evidence gathered by state or local authorities is inadmissible in federal court if it was gathered in violation of the Fourth Amendment
rdf:langString
Elkins v. United States
rdf:langString
Stewart
rdf:langString
Elkins v. United States, 364 U.S. 206 (1960), was a US Supreme Court decision that held the "silver platter doctrine", which allowed federal prosecutors to use evidence illegally gathered by state police, to be a violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Evidence of illegal wiretapping had been seized from the home of James Butler Elkins by Portland, Oregon police officers on an unrelated search warrant, and he was subsequently convicted in federal court. Elkins appealed, arguing that evidence found by the officers should have been inadmissible under the exclusionary rule, which forbids the introduction of most evidence gathered through Fourth Amendment violations in criminal court. In a 5–4 decision, the Court overturned the silver platter doctrine and Elkins' conviction. Associate Justice Potter Stewart wrote the majority opinion, while Associate Justices Felix Frankfurter and John M. Harlan II dissented. By giving a rationale for a broader interpretation of Fourth Amendment rights, the decision prepared the way for Mapp v. Ohio (1961), which applied the exclusionary rule to the states.
rdf:langString
埃尔金斯诉合众国案（英語：Elkins v. United States， U.S. 206 (1960)）是美国联邦最高法院1960年裁决的案件，判决认为“银盘理论”（silver platter doctrine）违反美利坚合众国宪法第四条修正案，该理论认为联邦法庭可以接纳州执法部门通过非法手段获得的证据。 俄勒冈州波特兰的警察通过一份不相关的搜查令从詹姆斯·巴特勒·埃尔金斯（James Butler Elkins）家中查获一些非法窃听的证据，埃尔金斯随后因这些证据而被联邦法庭判决有罪。他提出上诉，辩称根据第四条修正案下的證據排除法則，这些证据应该是不能够呈庭的。 最高法院以5比4的投票结果推翻银盘理论及埃尔金斯的定罪。大法官波特·斯图尔特起草多数意见，大法官费利克斯·弗兰克福特和約翰·馬歇爾·哈倫二世持反对意见。埃尔金斯诉合众国案对第四条修正案作出更宽泛的合理解读，为1961年的铺平道路，后者将把证据排除法则应用到各州。
rdf:langString
Lustig v. United States
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
9839
