Dickerson v. United States
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Dickerson_v._United_States an entity of type: Thing
Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. 428 (2000), upheld the requirement that the Miranda warning be read to criminal suspects and struck down a federal statute that purported to overrule Miranda v. Arizona (1966).
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Dickerson v. United States
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Charles Thomas Dickerson, Petitioner v. United States
xsd:integer
3113796
xsd:integer
1120622595
rdf:langString
Scalia
rdf:langString
Thomas
rdf:langString
Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
rdf:langString
U.S. Const. amend. V;
<second>
172800.0
<second>
25920.0
xsd:integer
428
xsd:integer
530
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-19
xsd:integer
2000
rdf:langString
Dickerson v. United States,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-26
xsd:integer
2000
rdf:langString
Charles Thomas Dickerson, Petitioner v. United States
rdf:langString
The mandate of Miranda v. Arizona that a criminal suspect be advised of certain constitutional rights governs the admissibility at trial of the suspect's statements, not the requirement of that such statements simply be voluntarily given.
rdf:langString
Dickerson v. United States
rdf:langString
Rehnquist
rdf:langString
Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. 428 (2000), upheld the requirement that the Miranda warning be read to criminal suspects and struck down a federal statute that purported to overrule Miranda v. Arizona (1966). The Court noted that neither party in the case advocated on behalf of the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. ยง 3501, the specific statute at issue in the case. Accordingly, it invited Paul Cassell, a former law clerk to Antonin Scalia and Warren E. Burger, to argue that perspective. Cassell was then a professor at the University of Utah law school; he was later appointed to, and subsequently resigned from, a federal district court judgeship in that state.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
10215