DeFunis v. Odegaard
http://dbpedia.org/resource/DeFunis_v._Odegaard an entity of type: Thing
드퍼니스 대 오데가드 사건(DeFunis v. Odegaard)는 미국 연방대법원 판례이다. 이 사건은 구체적 사건성을 결여하였다고 보아 각하되었다. 마르코 드퍼니스는 워성턴 법학대학원의 입학이 거부되어 소를 제기하였는데, 후에 조건부 입학이 되었고, 소송 중 졸업을 앞두고 있었다. 법원은 이 사건이 구체적 사건성의 예외에 포함되지 않는다고 하였다. 원고가 법학대학원을 졸업하는 것을 막을 수 없으므로 구체적 사건성의 예외인 자발적 중단이 아니며, 다시는 비슷한 처지에 놓이지 않을 것이기 때문에 “심리는 회피할 수 있지만 재발의 가능성이 있음”(Capable Of Repetition, Yet Evading Review) 원칙도 적용되지 않는다고 보았다.
rdf:langString
DeFunis v. Odegaard, 416 U.S. 312 (1974), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the case had become moot and so declined to render a decision on the merits. American student Marco DeFunis, who had been denied admission to the University of Washington School of Law in the state of Washington before he was provisionally admitted during the pendency of the case, was slated to graduate within a few months of the decision being rendered.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
DeFunis v. Odegaard
rdf:langString
드퍼니스 대 오데가드 사건
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Marco DeFunis, Jr., et al. v. Odegaard, et al.
xsd:integer
1851972
xsd:integer
1110345525
<second>
17280.0
rdf:langString
Douglas
rdf:langString
Brennan
rdf:langString
Douglas, White, Marshall
<second>
172800.0
<second>
17280.0
xsd:integer
312
xsd:integer
416
xsd:gMonthDay
--02-26
xsd:integer
1974
rdf:langString
DeFunis v. Odegaard,
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-23
xsd:integer
1974
rdf:langString
Marco DeFunis, Jr., et al. v. Odegaard, et al.
rdf:langString
The Court held that the case was moot.
rdf:langString
DeFunis v. Odegaard
rdf:langString
DeFunis v. Odegaard, 416 U.S. 312 (1974), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the case had become moot and so declined to render a decision on the merits. American student Marco DeFunis, who had been denied admission to the University of Washington School of Law in the state of Washington before he was provisionally admitted during the pendency of the case, was slated to graduate within a few months of the decision being rendered. The Court rejected the assertion that the case was in one of two exceptions to the mootness doctrine that were raised by the plaintiff. The case did not constitute "voluntary cessation" on the part of the defendant law school, as the plaintiff was now in his final quarter, and the law school could take no action to deny him the ability to graduate. Also, it was not a question that was "capable of repetition, yet evading review" because the plaintiff would never again face the situation, and others who might raise the same complaint in the future might be able to receive the courts' full review. DeFunis argued that materials brought to light during discovery and entered into evidence in the trial court showed that his initial denial of admission to the law school was the result of the operation of the law school's affirmative action policy, favoring the admission of minority applicants over better-qualified white candidates. Although the Court refused to consider the case on the merits in DeFunis, the issue of affirmative action returned to the Court without any problem of mootness, with an opinion on the merits achieved in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke.
rdf:langString
드퍼니스 대 오데가드 사건(DeFunis v. Odegaard)는 미국 연방대법원 판례이다. 이 사건은 구체적 사건성을 결여하였다고 보아 각하되었다. 마르코 드퍼니스는 워성턴 법학대학원의 입학이 거부되어 소를 제기하였는데, 후에 조건부 입학이 되었고, 소송 중 졸업을 앞두고 있었다. 법원은 이 사건이 구체적 사건성의 예외에 포함되지 않는다고 하였다. 원고가 법학대학원을 졸업하는 것을 막을 수 없으므로 구체적 사건성의 예외인 자발적 중단이 아니며, 다시는 비슷한 처지에 놓이지 않을 것이기 때문에 “심리는 회피할 수 있지만 재발의 가능성이 있음”(Capable Of Repetition, Yet Evading Review) 원칙도 적용되지 않는다고 보았다.
rdf:langString
yes
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
10707