Dandridge v. Williams
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Dandridge_v._Williams an entity of type: Thing
Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U.S. 471 (1970), was a United States Supreme Court case based on the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. It held that a state can cap welfare based on the Aid to Families with Dependent Children at $250.00 per month regardless of the family's size or need. The plaintiffs were attempting to make the amount variable based on size.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Dandridge v. Williams
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Dandridge v. Williams
xsd:integer
23256447
xsd:integer
1084826455
rdf:langString
Rehearing denied, .
rdf:langString
Douglas
rdf:langString
Marshall
rdf:langString
Brennan
rdf:langString
Brenann
rdf:langString
Burger, Black, Harlan, White
<second>
172800.0
rdf:langString
Williams v. Dandridge, 297 F. Supp. 450 ; probable jurisdiction noted, , order rescinded in part, .
xsd:integer
471
xsd:integer
397
xsd:gMonthDay
--12-09
xsd:integer
1969
rdf:langString
Dandridge v. Williams,
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-06
xsd:integer
1970
rdf:langString
Dandridge v. Williams
rdf:langString
The State of Maryland's regulation of capping welfare at $250 a month regardless of family size or need does not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
rdf:langString
Dandridge v. Williams
rdf:langString
Stewart
rdf:langString
Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U.S. 471 (1970), was a United States Supreme Court case based on the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. It held that a state can cap welfare based on the Aid to Families with Dependent Children at $250.00 per month regardless of the family's size or need. The plaintiffs were attempting to make the amount variable based on size.
rdf:langString
Black
rdf:langString
Harlan
rdf:langString
Burger
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
5812