Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Cruzan_v._Director,_Missouri_Department_of_Health an entity of type: Thing
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, 497 U.S. 261 (1990), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States involving a young adult incompetent. The first "right to die" case ever heard by the Court, Cruzan was argued on December 6, 1989 and decided on June 25, 1990. In a 5–4 decision, the Court affirmed the earlier ruling of the Supreme Court of Missouri and ruled in favor of the State of Missouri, finding it was acceptable to require "clear and convincing evidence" of a patient's wishes for removal of life support. A significant outcome of the case was the creation of advance health directives.
rdf:langString
Caso Cruzan contra el Director, Departamento de Salud de Missouri (en inglés: Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, 497 U.S. 261 (1990), fue un caso judicial de la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos. Tenía que ver con el derecho a morir. Nancy Cruzan era una mujer que se encontraba en un estado vegetativo persistente. Su familia quería detener los tratamientos de soporte vital para que ella pudiera morir. Los trabajadores del hospital se negaron a hacerlo sin una orden judicial. Eventualmente, el caso llegó a la Corte Suprema. El 25 de junio de 1990, el Tribunal decidió que era legal exigir "pruebas claras y convincentes" de que detener el soporte vital es lo que una persona hubiera querido.
rdf:langString
크루잔 대 미주리 보건국 사건(Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health)은 존엄사와 관련된 미국 연방대법원의 유명 판례이다.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health
rdf:langString
Caso Cruzan contra el Director, Departamento de Salud de Missouri
rdf:langString
크루잔 대 미주리 보건국 사건
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Nancy Beth Cruzan, by her parents and co-guardians, Cruzan et ux. v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, et al.
xsd:integer
1694969
xsd:integer
1105015911
rdf:langString
Stevens
rdf:langString
Brennan
rdf:langString
Marshall, Blackmun
rdf:langString
White, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy
<second>
172800.0
rdf:langString
Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri
xsd:integer
261
xsd:integer
497
xsd:gMonthDay
--12-06
xsd:integer
1989
rdf:langString
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-25
xsd:integer
1990
rdf:langString
Nancy Beth Cruzan, by her parents and co-guardians, Cruzan et ux. v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, et al.
xsd:integer
1
rdf:langString
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health
rdf:langString
Rehnquist
rdf:langString
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, 497 U.S. 261 (1990), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States involving a young adult incompetent. The first "right to die" case ever heard by the Court, Cruzan was argued on December 6, 1989 and decided on June 25, 1990. In a 5–4 decision, the Court affirmed the earlier ruling of the Supreme Court of Missouri and ruled in favor of the State of Missouri, finding it was acceptable to require "clear and convincing evidence" of a patient's wishes for removal of life support. A significant outcome of the case was the creation of advance health directives.
rdf:langString
Caso Cruzan contra el Director, Departamento de Salud de Missouri (en inglés: Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, 497 U.S. 261 (1990), fue un caso judicial de la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos. Tenía que ver con el derecho a morir. Nancy Cruzan era una mujer que se encontraba en un estado vegetativo persistente. Su familia quería detener los tratamientos de soporte vital para que ella pudiera morir. Los trabajadores del hospital se negaron a hacerlo sin una orden judicial. Eventualmente, el caso llegó a la Corte Suprema. El 25 de junio de 1990, el Tribunal decidió que era legal exigir "pruebas claras y convincentes" de que detener el soporte vital es lo que una persona hubiera querido.
rdf:langString
크루잔 대 미주리 보건국 사건(Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health)은 존엄사와 관련된 미국 연방대법원의 유명 판례이다.
rdf:langString
O'Connor
rdf:langString
Scalia
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
17284